My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-11-1979 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1979
>
06-11-1979 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2023 1:39:58 PM
Creation date
2/15/2023 1:38:30 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
74
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
lilNuTES OF A REGULAR iiEETlNG HELD MAY 21, 1973 P \/ h A <br />Ryerse moved, Guthrie seconded^ that approval <br />be granted, subject to the conditions in the <br />letter from tl»e Minnehaha Creek Katershed <br />District, Motion, Ayes (6) - Nays (0). <br />Mr. Coakley stated that the only way he could <br />create a double garage and also improve the <br />safety of his entry and exit point was to <br />receive a variance. Mr. Coakley claimed <br />that the County had inspected his property <br />and expressed no concern about plans to <br />further encroach on the road easement, and <br />that the Village sliould have a letter expressing <br />this in a short time. <br />Kullberg moved, Ryerse seconded, that approval <br />of the variance be granted as long as tne <br />garage does not encroach any farther than <br />the existing garage on the side lot line and <br />that it does not extend beyond existing <br />garages toward the road. Motion, Ayes (6) - <br />Nays (0). <br />Acting Chairman Searles noted that this <br />property was in the projected path of future <br />Highway 112. Since no official action has <br />been taken declaring where #12 will be, it <br />was felt that approval of this "simple <br />division" was in order. <br />Ryerse moved, Guthrie seconded, that the <br />division of Parcel 3100 be approved in <br />accordance with Section 39.021 of the ordinance. <br />Motion, Ayes (6) - Nays (0). <br />The required setback for a stable is 150* <br />and Acting Chairman Searles explained that <br />the obvious intent is to protect the surrounding <br />property owners. Mr. Benhardus explained <br />that his stable would be encroaching on the <br />Park Reserve which is heavily wooded and as • <br />a result would probably never be intensly <br />used. In order to construct a stable to <br />adequat'ly house his four horses and their <br />feed. Mi,. Benhardus t^ould require a variance <br />no matter where on the lot it would be located. <br />Mr, Benhardus felt that the proposed location <br />was the most reasonable because the encroachment <br />was on the Park Reserve, and that the natural <br />terrain and vegetation would reduce the visibility <br />of the stable. <br />(Continued) <br />H I Pj HagT 2 <br />VARIANCE -ORDI jn 'ANCE 125 <br />(Continued) <br />VARIANCE <br />Coakley <br />DIVISION <br />Harrison <br />VARIANCE <br />Benhardus <br />I
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.