Laserfiche WebLink
1 . <br />Hiirjiss or A czwission K*:;-7rr»ic keij > !o\7?3-a 7, 1977 - ?ags 7 <br />Tns i*roJect'rd location for •lisj'dsal of t.?ie tjoils v;js the r.fsin <br />conc*rrn of the Cor-Tlsslon. Crono hns rtQOi>tc-i a i<o3icy to deny <br />previous npplicHtions for of si>olls vithin 1,0CX) ft. <br />of the shoreline. <br />After a len^jthy discussion, nassel roved, Kfcru.ah seconded <br />table this aj*plicatlon with the request that a detal <br />imp and detailed plan for dredtiiiig be submitted with the ur;der- <br />staiidin^i that the dredging and spoils deposit will not violate <br />Criinance with the understanding that the Kid-cat <br />dredging uethod will oi.e:'ate fix>.u the cnvironiLental standpoint <br />as represented, 'fne Planning Cors-KissicD gives co.icer>tual approval <br />to going forward and getting this data with the understanding <br />that approve! of tlie projected spoils dlsjosal site would be <br />deten»:lned after careful review of all reports docir-enting <br />adventeges from project and assurance that project would not <br />adversely effect the quality of the water. Fi-ojosed dispcjsal <br />site should be warhed. <br />Kotlca - Ayes (4), Kays (l) - Hurr, Abstain (l) - ^fel>onald. <br />rr# 4 7 5 <br />Kr. Butterfield was present. He is requesting an addition <br />to the existing structure. The addition to the south ei>d of the <br />house would not interfere with the existing non-conforelng <br />side yard setback to tbe north. The Zoning Administrator <br />advised that staff had Issued a permit for the family and <br />recreation room portion subject to approval of the foyer. Tbe <br />survey submitted was somewhat vague. Tbe Planning Commission <br />interpreted the survey to indicate the existing fiont yard <br />setback to be 24 ft. A variance of 8l ft. would be required. <br />WRFJt BUPTERJ-’Iieii) <br />3925 WATiiKfOWN iOAD <br />i-'KOUr & SID8 S&l'BACK FOR <br />HOUSE ADDITION TO EXISTUll <br />»OK-C01tfORMINO LOCATION <br />#326 <br />After some review, Hessel moved, Hammerel seconded, to recomniend <br />approval of the I8 ft. side yard and 8l ft. front setback <br />variance per plan subaitted. <br />tt>tlon - Ayes (6), Hays (O). <br />Kr. Iblde was present. He is requesting approval to construct * <br />a second stoxy on his existing residence ^icta Is currently <br />non-conforming in lot area, lake and side setbacks. !Hie <br />proposal would not Increase tbe existing hardeover. ^e proposed <br />plar. indicates a 20 ft. height limit. <br />Hr. Huibleb Informed the Planning Commission this application <br />VBS submitted prior to the action recently taken by Council <br />granting staff approval of situations of this nature. <br />w<^m>KD "MIKE” MDLDI <br />1428 BALDUR PARK ROAD <br />VARIANCE - LOT AREA A WID <br />AND lAKESHORE A SIDE YARD <br />SETBACK ON EXISTINO NON- <br />00iri>X>»41NQ LOT AND HOUSE <br />#327 <br />Tbe Planning Coinmieslon sviggested the applicant combine the <br />subject property with his proj«rty ecross the street. Toe <br />applicant Indicated no objection to this. Re was advised <br />that a lot combination would ellnlnate any building on this <br />property across the street. <br />McDonald coved, Eaminerel seconded, to recoroend approval of <br />the variance subject to combination of Lota 8, 17 and I8 into <br />one parcel. Justification: no increase In hardcover. <br />Motion - Ayes (6), Nays (O). <br />■Mil 'IHill.