My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-12-1979 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
1970-1979
>
1979
>
02-12-1979 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2023 1:38:27 PM
Creation date
2/15/2023 1:37:33 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 \rv\450 I <br />y <br />k_ <br />Mff 454 <br />TO: <br />FROM: <br />Planning Coninlsslon <br />Alan P. Olson, Village Planner <br />DATE:Septenber 19, 1978 <br />SUBJECT: Mrs. Wyatt Moe, 1220 Loma Linda <br />Proposed Culvert <br />John Gerhardson and I have been discussing this proposal with <br />Mrs. Moe for some time. In essence, she would like to extend <br />an existing culvert to the lake. This Involves engineering <br />review by the City and the Watershed; hence our request for an <br />engineering design submittal. <br />The proposal would also involve construction and filling within <br />the lakeshore setback area; hence this Informal request for your <br />opinion. Before engineering costs are Invested, Mrs. Moe <br />would like to know whether or not you would consider this <br />application. <br />I stress that staff cannot review or issue any reconmendatlons <br />until engineering data is submitted. This Is conceptual <br />review only. <br />cc: John Gerhardson <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING - SEPTEMBER 25, 1978 <br />Mrs. Moe was present. Dlsccuslon regarding technical/engineering <br />concerns versus policy question of installing storm sewer to the <br />lake. Planning Commission direction Is that water quality and <br />engineering protections are important but that conceptually this <br />correction of an existing problem is reasonable. Should review <br />the retention capability of rear holding area. <br />■ £>■ AM y T A -V
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.