My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-26-1979 Planning Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1970-1979
>
1979
>
11-26-1979 Planning Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2023 1:34:19 PM
Creation date
2/15/2023 1:34:06 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
W <br />i£-^5r" to'.. <br />lii-r i; 'ii ¥ <br />MINUTES OP A PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON NOVEMBER 26, 1979 <br />Page 5 <br />-i <1 <br />© <br />Dr. and Mrs. Van Tassel were present. Mabusth <br />clarified the circ<imstances leading to the <br />misunderstanding of the remodeling and addition <br />to the rear of the structure. The Staff in <br />ventory of the Van Tassel's Conditional Use <br />Permit Application of this summer did not <br />reveal the rear addition. The Zoning <br />Administrator, after an inspection of the <br />site, located the original site plan (presented <br />to Council in Van Tassel's Variance Application <br />of last summer) in the building inspector's <br />file. There is still no need for a hardcover <br />variance with the 12' x 12' addition. In this <br />application the applicants request a side yard <br />variance of 4.6' for a 10' x 16' deck. The <br />hardship claimed by the applicants are steep <br />slope of rear yard, tree at Northeast corner <br />of screened porch and no adjacent lots <br />available. Planning Commission advised the <br />Van Tassels that a letter from the neighbors <br />to the north would support their case. Jabbour <br />questioned whether the hardships claimed <br />Supported the request for another deck when <br />the Commission had just approved deck space <br />on top of the boathouse. <br />Hannah moved to recommend approval of the varianc <br />for a 4.6' side yard due to the hardship of the <br />steep slope on rear of property and tree at the <br />Northeast corner; the deck would afford the <br />additional recreation area. <br />Hammerel seconded the motion. Vote: Ayes (3) <br />H2unmerel, Hannah, Adams; Nays (1), No Vote (1). <br />Wilson felt the deck was not integral enough <br />to the use of the property to realize a hardship. <br />Jabbour did not record a vote. Jabbour will <br />respond to Council. <br />ROBERT A. VAN TASSEL <br />1170 Loma Linda <br />VARIANCE <br />(#531) <br />: ■■ •...•• ■ ■ <br />-• ■ ■ . .iV. <br />.. .. .. . ..... <br />•••• • . <br />.-'J !. : V- <br />; ; r-. V.=:v 3.:^ <br />. to'-..^ <br />M <br />77^ <br />mmMimm <br />mm <br />■m
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.