Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF A PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON AUGUST 21, 1979 <br />PAGE 3 <br />Mr. Jansen was present. He stated no matter which <br />side of the house the garage is located on a variance <br />would be necessary. Placement of the garage on the <br />north side permits use of the existing access on <br />Brown Road South which is the safest access for this <br />property. No public comments were heard. <br />Hannah moved to recommend approval of the 18' variance <br />request on the basis that there is no better location <br />for the garage and the safety factor of the access. <br />Motion seconded by Jabbour. Vote: Ayes (6), Nays (0). <br />Motion passed unanimously. <br />Mrs. York was present. No public comments were heard, <br />however, letters from the neighbors at 2820 Casco Point <br />Road and 2829 Casco Point Road had been submitted <br />noting no objection to the York's proposed plans. <br />General consensus of the Planning Commission was that <br />there was no problem with the requested side yard <br />variance, but they were not in favor of any encroachment <br />within the 75' lakeshore setback. <br />,1m Hannah moved to recommend approval of the .9' left <br />side setback variance and 5% hardcover variance to <br />permit construction of the porch addition but to <br />deny any encroachment into the 75' lakeshore setback. <br />Motion seconded by Adams. Vote; Ayes (6), Nays (0). <br />Motion passed unanimously. <br />The applicant was not represented. Planning Commission <br />called for a Public Information Meeting to be scheduled <br />for Monday, September 24, 1979 at 7:30 P.M. <br />Mr. Petersen was present. He explained the nature of <br />his business required communication with his offices <br />PHILLIP JANSEN <br />1085 South Brown Rd. | <br />VARIT^CE I <br />(#505) <br />i <br />DAVID YORKS <br />2825 Casco Point Rd. <br />VARIANCE <br />(#506) <br />1 <br />I <br />WILLIAM PEARCE <br />1405/1485 Sixth <br />Avenue North <br />SUBDIVISION <br />Work Session <br />(#495) <br />TIMOTHY PETERSEN <br />280 Orono Orchard Rd <br />located outside of the U.S. which is why he is requesting CONDITIONAL USE <br />an antenna higher than the 65' permitted by code. <br />He encouraged the Planning Commission to visit the site <br />and he would show them his entire operation. He also <br />stated the antenna he proposes to install is rated for <br />safety up to 400' while he is requesting 120'. Adams <br />^^was concerned about the inspection and maintenance of <br />C^the antenna (s). There are no FCC regulations which <br />apply to this request. Mabusth stated she would request <br />an interpretation of the code regarding antennas from <br />the City attorney. <br />PERMIT/VARIANCE <br />Work Session <br />(#500)