Laserfiche WebLink
'4 <br />■'i <br />• » <br />MINUTES OF A PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON AUGUST 13, 1979 <br />PAGE 3 A- <br />r <br />Mr. Marfield was present. Main concern of the <br />Planning Commission was the hardcover issue. <br />Mabusth stated that normally gravel driveways <br />are not considered hardcover. Consensus of the <br />Planning Commission was that the definition of <br />hardcover as used in our Zoning Code would include <br />gravel driveways and therefore they felt some <br />direction was needed from the Council. The <br />applicant presently has a three car garage and <br />is now requesting a "barn*' two cars and a <br />loft above for storage. <br />Hannah moved to table the application until some <br />direction can be obtained from the Council regarding <br />gravel driveways/hardcover issue. Motion seconded <br />by Jabbour. Vote: Ayes (4), Nays (0), Vacated <br />Seat (1) Wilson - vacated his seat as he is a <br />neighbor of the area. <br />Discussion was opened to make a recommendation <br />^to the Council regarding Planning Commission's <br />^desire that gravel driveways be considered as <br />hardcover. <br />Adams moved to recommend that Council establish <br />a policy of considering a well-constructed <br />‘I gravel driveway as hardcover. Motion seconded <br />by Jabbour. Vote: Ayes (5), Nays (0). <br />Mr. Safar was present. Also present was Mr. Maland <br />Hurr, 930 Partenwood Road. The application had been <br />denied at the July 9. 1979 meeting although it was <br />stipulated that the canopy could be considered again <br />if submitted without the wall. The applicant has <br />now submitted plans showing a wall of 11'. Mr. Hurr <br />felt the application was still essentially the same <br />and no hardship had been demonstrated. He again <br />stated that he represented the neighbors who are <br />opposed to the granting of any variance. <br />Ik <br />Consensus of the Planning Commission was that the <br />plan had not changed and therefore the original <br />motion to deny was upheld. <br />SAMUEL MARFIELD <br />2455 Scotch Pine Lane <br />VARIANCE <br />(#450) <br />.fa <br />X lU. i <br />r-.,/ <br />JACK SAFAR <br />925 Partenwood Road <br />VARIANCE <br />(#485)