Laserfiche WebLink
^ r*' ‘ <br />4 <br />© <br />i <br />MINUTES OF A PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON MARCH 12, 1979 <br />Page 5 <br />Hurr was concerned about the possibility of the <br />drainage system malfunctioning. Cook stated that <br />if that did happen the run-off would go into the <br />lake. McDonald suggested that possibly some type of <br />maintenance agreement between the City and the owner <br />would have to be worked out. Both Hurr and McDonald <br />stated they had trouble relating to this as a wall <br />or fence and felt it should be considered as a <br />structure. <br />Wilson stated he had no problems with the fence being <br />3-1/2* high, but he did not feel the pillars should <br />be allowed. He felt that the conditional use permit <br />should only be for fill behind the wall which would <br />be important to the drainage. He also felt the wall <br />should not be permitted within the 75* setback. <br />John Haxnnerel stated: **I think in view of the fact <br />that obviously the Planning Commission is wrestling <br />with this and really getting no place and with six <br />weeks probably before any more building can be done, <br />I move to table the application as our engineer ought <br />to determine for us in some way where ground level is <br />and what height of wall will be necessary for erosion <br />control so we can make further study of this prior to <br />giving an opinion. Motion seconded by Hurr although <br />she objected to the City paying the engineering costs. <br />Mabusth stated that the engineering costs would be <br />charged to the owner. Mitchell stated that this <br />information was already in the hands of the Holzer*s <br />engineer and could be submitted to the City engineer <br />for his review. <br />ALEXANDER HOLZER <br />2677 Casco Point Rd. <br />COND. USE PERMIT <br />#436 (Cont.) <br />Frahm felt that it should be evaluated only as to the <br />erosion control. The engineer should determine the <br />height necessary to function as effective erosion <br />control and the Planning Commission could go from there. <br />Vote: Ayes (3), Nays (2) Frahm & Wilson Opposed <br />Frahm - Not sure that our engineer should design the <br />system or do the study. <br />Wilson - does not feel our engineer should do the <br />work and the applicant should be given the <br />opportunity to submit the data. <br />1 <br />. ii <br />■:<