My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-20-1980 Planning Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1980
>
10-20-1980 Planning Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2023 12:18:44 PM
Creation date
2/15/2023 12:18:35 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
- PAGE 3 <br />* <br />nt Road <br />V,-. <br />• i '. . :; ■' .7,.;. 1;. • ■ .••%■’••■'■ .c--- \ <br />'m^‘- <br />f *■ <br />MINUTES OF A PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON OCTOBER 20, 1980 - PAGE 4 <br />5. Property taxed separately - never received <br />benefit of homestead relief. <br />6. New building site will nDt create; a new curb <br />cut. <br />7. A house comparable in size to those in existing <br />neighborhood could be located on lot meeting <br />all setback and hardcover standards - even if <br />additional 4' is required on left side yard. <br />8. Of some 24 homes in the Casco Point neighborhood <br />19 are 60' wide or less. <br />and subject to the following conditions: <br />1. No zoning variances will be granted with a <br />building permit. <br />2. Drainage and utility easements must be worked <br />out between the two parties. <br />3. Engineering study of drainage area roust accompany <br />building permit. <br />In addition, Planning Commission recommends that the <br />sections in the ordinance dealing with common ownership <br />be reviewed specifically to address the issue of <br />preventing misunderstandings of this type and establish <br />realistic standards in consideration of existing <br />neighborhood development patterns. <br />Motion seconded by Rovegno. Vote: Ayes (5), Nays (1) <br />Jabbour: "It is difficult for me to vote against <br />the motidn, but our code is too specific in the <br />case of common ownership. As a member of the <br />Planning Commission, I feel that-I should vote <br />against it as there have not been sever .1 examples <br />which have given us a substantial guideline. If <br />the Council sees it fit to grant the variance, <br />it would do so very easily and possibly set a <br />precedent to guide us with similar cases in the future." <br />Mr. Lorge asked that his application be scheduled for <br />the Council meeting of November 10, 1980 because of <br />business conflicts. <br />RICHARD LORGE <br />2697 Casco Point Road <br />VARIANCE <br />(#581) Cont’ <br />i3^'-. ■. ' u-, ■. ■■
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.