Laserfiche WebLink
f^GE 4 <br />Drive <br />: Road <br />I MINUTES OF A PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON SEPTEMBER 22 <br />P ^ <br />I" ■ <br />Jabbopr reviewed for applicant the implications of <br />common ownership when both lots ' <br />He noted how difficult it was for him to imagine <br />this was not a buildable lot in view of previous <br />applications. <br />% <br />Frahm questicned the Braun application and the <br />reason for denying it. <br />The neighbov’s concerns are summarized as follows: <br />1 Drainace - additional hardcover on Lot 3 will <br />overbuiden an already limited drainageway. <br />2. Code clearly requires at least 80% of width <br />and Lot 3 has only 60 • <br />3. Challenged applicant’s claim that Lot 4 has <br />always been retained independently. <br />a. access for Lot 4 via Lot 3 <br />b. water lines serving house runs through <br />Lot 3 <br />c. both lots are maintained as one yard <br />4 If Lot 3 is deemed buildable, how are the <br />following considerations to be resolved: <br />a. setback of existing house is located <br />6' from the side property line. <br />b. access to lake impeded by steep slope <br />and wall. <br />c. If 115' lakeshore setback is maintained, <br />the house would be located on top of <br />retention area. <br />d. new owner of Lot 4 would have to grant <br />driveway and utility easement and agree <br />to shared use and there is no written <br />proof that new owner agrees to this. <br />Hammerel moved to table the Lorge variance subject <br />to staff reporting on the following points: <br />1. Braun subdivision application - reason for denying <br />2. Review background of RLS1333 <br />3. Review background of Winship Subdivision <br />4. Review background of H. Johnson application. <br />RICHARD LORGE <br />2697 Casco Point <br />VARIANCE <br />(#581) Cont. <br />k V;,-. ^ c V <br />N'-Vr <br />a <br />■■1 •- "f V-