My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-18-1980 Planning Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1980
>
08-18-1980 Planning Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2023 12:17:28 PM
Creation date
2/15/2023 12:17:18 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF A PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON AUGUST 18, 1980 - PAGE 3 <br />^ was submitted by the neighbors in <br />attendance from Betty & Wes Wolverton, of <br />3120 High Lane, stating their opposition to <br />"the granting of #576". <br />The following is a summary of concerns cited <br />by the neighbors: <br />ROBERT & JOANNE MORTENSON <br />3280 Watertown Road <br />CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ’ <br />(#576) Cont. <br />i. <br />2. <br />3. <br />4. <br />5. <br />Encourage commercial traffic in an area <br />that has a record of traffic problems. <br />Kilbo's comments in the Zoning Administrator's <br />memo were challenged by Ducharme. Kilbo <br />contends a change in the access will alleviate <br />the additional vehicular traffic created by <br />the greenhouse use. Ducharme claims there have <br />been several accidents in this area. <br />)^l®nning Commission noted that the property <br />could be divided into three residential units <br />creating even greater burdens on the neighborhood <br />Neighbors stated that they would prefer this to <br />a commercial greenhouse. <br />Questioned Council's role in directing the <br />Mortensons to this specific site. Commission <br />stated that Council had not directed the <br />applicants to this specific 6.7 acre lot, <br />but in general to seek out the rural areas of <br />Orono for a 5+ acre site. <br />Is it the intent of the Comprehensive Plan to <br />allow commercial greenhouses in a 2-acre <br />residential zoning district? <br />Planning Commission advised according to the <br />Zoning Code a commercial greenhouse would be <br />allowed in 1/2 acre zoning district if all <br />other standards could be satisfied. The <br />Comprehensive Plan specifically designates <br />the rural area for non-residential developments <br />like greenhouses. It does not distinguish <br />between the rural 2—acre or 5—acre zones. <br />Dimunition in the neighboring residential <br />properties as a result of the commercial <br />operation. <br />Greenhouses produce contaminating wastes. In <br />a non-sewered area what controls do you put on <br />the waste water from the greenhouse operation? <br />How could this be a feasible location for a <br />greenhouse so close to a wetland and creek? <br />mm-" <br />ut/ :• .> <br />V: <br />H
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.