My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-23-1980 Planning Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1980
>
06-23-1980 Planning Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2023 12:17:03 PM
Creation date
2/15/2023 12:16:50 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
M <br />mm <br />r^- <br />, Af . <br />a <br />minutes of a planning commission meeting held on JUNE 23, 1980 - PAGE 5 <br />5, The conditional use permit shall expire upon <br />sale of the property. <br />6. All four lots must be combined. <br />Motion seconded by Heunnmerel <br />Nays (3). Motion passed. <br />Vote: Ayes (4), <br />ROBERT MORTENSON <br />1205 Arbor Street <br />CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT <br />(«560) (Cont.) <br />•‘A <br />^■1 <br />Frahm was opposed (especially with the proposed <br />future addition) as he felt it was inconsistent <br />with the neighborhood - commercial/residential. <br />He also had concerns regarding increasing traffic <br />on Arbor Street.■' If'-.: <br />Wilson felt the proposed use was alright and was in <br />general agreement with the motion, but he was opposed <br />to approving any future addition at this time. He <br />would prefer to review the addition at a later date <br />when the City has had the opportunity to observe <br />the operation. He also favored a restriction on the <br />permit be that traffic generated by the operation <br />be no more than that generated by a normal residence. <br />... <br />. -'Pa..)- <br />.a.,'- >■ ■ <br />A <br />Ai <br />i.-* <br />1 <br />Adams was generally in favor of the concept, but was <br />concerned that the investment would become substantial <br />enough ^in the hobby to necessitate a more commercial <br />operation. He cautioned the Planning Commission of <br />"creeping commercialism". <br />Mr. Hagen was present. Mabusth stated the Public <br />Works Coordinator had problems with the location of <br />the garage - nearness to the right-of-way. It was <br />noted that this was the only feasible location <br />and consistent with the neighborhood. It was noted <br />that more turnaround area could be maintained if <br />the garage was moved 5* closer to the deck. <br />RUSSELL HAGEN <br />19(T5 Eagerness Pt. <br />VARIANCE <br />(#564) <br />Adams moved to table the application to give the <br />applic2uit and staff time to determine the exact <br />location of the garage and the variance needed. <br />Motion seconded by Hannah. Vote: Ayes (7), <br />Nays (0). Motion passed unanimously. <br />w <br />mm <br />lii I i <br />firnraimnwiiiroiBifir^T f^rmirf nuiKWti
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.