Laserfiche WebLink
# <br />MINUTES OF A PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON APRIL 7, 1980 - PAGE 3 <br />Mr. and Mrs. Udell were present. Staff recommends DON UDELL <br />approval be contingent upon the combination of all 1210 Loma Linda Avenue <br />five lots. Mr. and Mrs. Udoll were opposed to <br />the combination of all five and through further <br />discussion a combination of Lots 1 & 2 and 3-5 <br />was agreed upon by both the Commission and the <br />Udells. It was noted that there was no hardcover <br />problem with this application. Howe" r. the <br />consensus of the Commission was they would not <br />approve a variance for a building over 1,000 s.f. <br />Udells were told that they could build an attached <br />garage to their residence and if they met the 10' <br />setback would not even need a variance. At this <br />point they indicated they would like an opportunity <br />to look into this possibility. Hammerel moved to <br />table this application for submittal of plans if a <br />variance is necessary or if none are required the <br />applicant can apply for a building permit. Motion <br />seconded by Jabbour. Vote: Ayes (6), Nays (0) <br />Motion passed unanimously. <br />VARIANCE <br />(#542) <br />m <br />'i, ■ :’r <br />' . r ••r. •Jy <br />Mr. Butterfield was present. Mabusth briefly <br />reviewed the request. Planning Commission <br />had no problem with the application. <br />Hannah moved to recommend approval of the <br />conditional use permit as no variances are <br />required. Motion seconded by Frahm. <br />Vote: Ayes (6), Nays (0) Motion passed <br />unanimously. <br />LOREN BUTTERFIELD <br />3925 Watertown Road <br />CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT <br />(#543) <br />Mr. Seifert's representative, Mr. Freeberg, was <br />present. No public comments were heard. The <br />proposed plaoi will be a reduction in hardcover <br />of about 10%. Consensus of the Planning Commission(#548) <br />was that they could not approve the variance <br />with such an excessive use of the land. They <br />questioned if there was a possibility that the <br />structure within the 75' lakeshore setback could <br />be removed in lieu of the variance being approved. <br />Mr. Freeberg stated he would convey these concerns <br />and questions to Mr. Seifert- Hammerel moved to <br />table the application pending receipt of additional <br />information and direction from the applicant. <br />Motion seconded by Hannah. Vote: Ayes (6), <br />Nays (0) Motion passed unanimously. <br />MILTON SEIFERT <br />1856 Shadywood Road <br />VARIANCE