Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />#58 <br />^^Lxjcr io <br />X Variance Application <br />Kichard J, Lorge <br />HARDSHIP <br />2. <br />3. <br />A hardship situation exists with the subject lot, (Lot 3 <br />Auditors Subdivision 265) <br />1, The subject property was platted many years ago. <br />Lots on both sides (north it south) have since been <br />improved thereby eliminating any adjacent vacant <br />land. <br />The property is nearly one half acre (19»500 sq, <br />ft,) but is long and narrow (over 300 feet by 60 <br />feet) <br />The variance request is for lot v/idth <br />Granting of this variance can be shown to be within <br />the intent of Land Use Plans by examination of the <br />local area,For example there are a number of lots <br />to the north which are 60 feet in width many of <br />which have considerable less area than the subject <br />lot. Granting the variance will in no way affect <br />the public health, safety or general welfai'e. <br />Zoning and Planning Groups end the Courts have gen­ <br />erally held that the loss of a View or other <br />esthetic arguments by neighbors arr. insufficient <br />to deny an application for reasonable variances. <br />4. <br />5. <br />6,