Laserfiche WebLink
f <br />^/Ustf= <br />424 UHOL 2*8 NORTH WESTERN REPORTER. Id S! <br />No M«a»l.iaN.WJd»I(lJMV talk.*. <br />2JSS be “"** oHin^ ftr m ^ <br />tiimi tKe k>w€it float induding bocment eounty* f 87551, wbd. 8, <br />floor*. • Im* th»B three (8) feet •bove the tioB of the tiUe Mid » owi^. tk« <br />known wnter level. Dodu and' better pmetiee would be to indu^ more <br />.^k^DiojeeUoiit into the water ehall detail than wai publUhed by Ito^ Cwnty. <br />oUe yard aetbadi equal to we are eatiiried that the public <br />that required in the applicable loning di»- quato notice of the beani^ and of the en- <br />triet and thall be parallel with an cxton- ,Jctinent of thewiinfordinance <br />tioii of tb« »do ywri lot HottMm ox lot woe y*m <br />into the water ehall not eaeeed a diitaiiee <br />greater than one-third (H) the lakeehore <br />frontage and ehalUn no care extend fifty ^ __________ <br />(50) feet beyond the ahordine. _ | ^ oontinuous nature of the violation, <br />file finance pWmWa [hk erection ol a^ ^ injuncUve'relief granted to the county <br />fltructure, other than a boathouee. mtun w | aDDronrinte._____ <br />^^^^^^rb^ourt^udgmen^i^V <br />ere in accordance with the e^dence. <br />Defendant erected an addition to hit boat- <br />home contrary to the ordinance. Beeaute <br />. ______aT dkre wuJRflmi <br />fltructure, other than a boathouee, wiuun lo a moot appropriate^ <br />feet of the ihoreline of any lake within ^ <br />oount; <br />^j^yiruvMrwiite^ <br />nw to'ite adoption, a notice of h^ng <br />.■TtliP aroat^^ning ordinance <br />liahed. Although the notice dio noi etate <br />nny “intention to enact," which ie the Ian- , <br />guagc need in Minn.St. 875hl. eubd. 2, H <br />did indicate that the ordinance wi* recom ­ <br />mended for odoption by the county board. <br />wditor, the town eierke. ^ the noning J-Mf. • ChDd.aiiditor; the town eierke. end the eoning • CbBd. <br />board. After the cnaetment, only the ^ SHARP. peHHmero AppeDant, <br />and imolution number of the loning ordi- ^ <br />LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICE OP <br />1.^ »» <. lOMfESOTA. <br />applied for a permh for the constioction of No. 48170. <br />nriginal building, defendant addedaeec^ jaly 7, 1978. <br />etory, 12 feet by 16 feet, on top ol ine <br />CaUiouee. He did not apply for a permit . <br />for Ibie latter project, or fora varianee or a I The Dietnet Owrt, Hennepin <br />neoning. and the oompletod building doca liindeay Arthur.'J., denied mother e <br />««i inform to the eouaty aon iag ordinance^to vacate termination of parental ngw <br />^11 .1 1.- DefendMit reatendi that the and petition for diecretion^ revi« <br />WJ ttit: (jj <br />I <br />not the <br />tag of <br />Al <br />Llnta <br />venile <br />ninate <br />righto <br />at tin <br />«|280 <br />1 Infi <br />la <br />righto <br />apadft <br />potitta <br />make <br />eviden <br />«an <br />I. Infi <br />In <br />righto, <br />BoUiec <br />parent <br />■taati <br />hndfc <br />at wl <br />•entod <br />4. m <br />m <br />eowt <br />and M <br />ba rm <br />SROt <br />Ik Inf <br />I <br />beet <br />iive I <br />nrinal <br />•a <br />* <br />'A