10-06-1980 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

I TO:Planning Commission FROM:Alan P. Olson, Village Planner DATE:August 13, 1-980 SUBJECT: #555 Cortlen Cloutier, 2480 Casco Point Road - Variance fc Conditional Use Permit On June 23, 1980, the Planning Commission recommended denial of a guest house conditional use permit for the Cloutier boathouse, and denial of a variance requested to permit expansion of the existing second story structure. After the Planning Commission meeting, the City received letters from neighbor Wilbur Anderson and from former building inspector Mike Scheller. These were reviewed at the Council meeting of July 30, 1980 at which time the file was referred back to the Planning Commission for additional review of the facts. Cloutier verbally contends that the existing second story of the structure was previously authorized. The City files contain a permit record for a "30 X 20 bOwthouse" only. There has been no permit issued for utility service to the building or for plumbing or heating. There is no assessment for anything other than the main house. In addition, the Scheller letter now states clearly that he issued the permit and inspected only for a single story boathouse. • Planning Commission is asked by the Council to review the Anderson and Scheller letters, the attached Minnesota Supreme Court case, and the planner's memo of July 24, 1980. Mr. Cloutier was asked to present any new information he may have to document his position. If he does so. Planning Commission should consider that as it compares to the official City records. After review of all new information, Plemning Commission is asked to make additional findings and recommendations for final Council action. ZONING UPDATE - SEPTEMBER 18, 1980 The Cloutier application was to be reviewed at the Planning Commission meeting of August 18, 1980, but applicant asked that it be tabled un;.il the meeting of September 22, 1980. I advised Cloutier that Council >4d set a deadline of September 29, 1980 to complete the review of his conditional use permit application. We agreed that if he could not meet the deadline for all new information that he would write a letter asking Council to consider additional delay. I have heard nothing from the applicant and have scheduled the application for your final review.