My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-18-1980 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1980 Planning Packets
>
08-18-1980 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2023 12:08:34 PM
Creation date
2/15/2023 12:08:01 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
TO:Planning Conunission and Council <br />Atern KqJ <br />FROM:Jeanne Mabusth, Zoning Administrator <br />DATE:August 13, 1980 <br />SUBJECT: #545 Bruce Hepp, 2605 West Lafayette Road - SUBDIVISION <br />LIST OF EXHIBITS <br />Exhibit 1 - <br />Exhibit 2 - <br />Exhibit 3 - <br />Exhibit 4 ~ <br />Exhibit 5 - <br />Exhibit 6 - <br />Exhibit 7 - <br />Survey (2 lot plat) <br />Site Plam for Lot 2 <br />Proposed house and floor plcm <br />Suggested Site Plan <br />Lowe Memo (dated May 8, 1980) <br />Minutes of May 5, 1980 <br />Plat Map <br />REVIEW OF APPLICATION <br />Subdivision: 2 lot plat <br />Zoning District: LR-IB <br />- total area 2.8 acres <br />Mr. Hepp proposes a 2 lot plat of combined Lot 9 and part of Lot 10,^ <br />Shore Hills Subdivision (review the plat map enclosed). At the -Public <br />Information Meeting, several neighbors in attendance opposed the <br />subdivision noting standards in the restrictive covenants for their <br />subdivision were not being satisfied. The neighbors were advised by <br />the Commission that the City does not enforce private restrictive <br />covenants. It is the Council's responsibility to assure the stemdards <br />of the City's ordinances are being met. Planning Commission advised <br />the neighbors that further written comments would be appreciated and <br />reviewed by the staff and Planning Commission at the appropriate meeting <br />night. <br />The Planning Commission did have reservations concerning the suitable <br />building area for the newly created lot. The two private driveways <br />intersecting the subject property affect the only building site for <br />Lot 2. Plcuming Commission as)ced that the following information be <br />furnisned by the developer before any action could be talcen by the <br />Commission: <br />1. Designate existing structures and their setbacks from all newly <br />created lot lines. <br />2. Access easements - note width of each driveway. <br />3.A site plan for Lot 2 for a proposed house of comparable size <br />designating setback from lot lines and pond area. <br />4. Area of each lot exclusive of driveway easements. <br />• ;
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.