My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-21-1980 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1980
>
07-21-1980 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2023 12:06:12 PM
Creation date
2/15/2023 12:04:47 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
107
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
t <br />r'-j. <br />ULAR MEETING OF THE 0R0!;0 COUNCIL, FEBRUARY 11, 1980 Page 6 <br />no County has closed the Navarre Lane access off <br />at County Road 19 because of its nearness to the <br />traffic signal at the intersection of County Roads <br />15 and 19 and dangers arising from left turns <br />being made by cars going south on County Road 19. <br />The County has stated that the Navarre Lane access <br />will never be opened and that an additional curb <br />cut will not be approved in the right-of-way if the <br />City approves vacation. <br />STREET VACATION <br />Navarre Lane <br />(Continued) <br />The applicants propose a general cleanup and <br />landscaping of the subject area. A corner of the <br />Church encroaches into the Navarre Lane right-of- <br />way. The Church has been unable to obtain clear <br />title to the property. The service station owner <br />is concerned that he retain access to County Road <br />19 and wants to cleanup the frontage along Shadywood <br />Road. We have heard nothing from the Lafayette <br />Ridge group except that they signed the applicants <br />letter. <br />Please review the Planning Commission Minutes of <br />November 26, 1979 and January 28, 1980 for back <br />ground discussion and recommendation. <br />The following are summaries of reviews from staff <br />meibers and the Hennepin County Highway Department: <br />A. Comments from the Public Works Coordinator; <br />1.How costly would it be for the City, gas and <br />telephone companies to locate the four under' <br />lying utilities? <br />The cost for the location of all utilities <br />should be borne by the party requesting the <br />vacation. We can assist by making sewer and <br />water as-builts available to them. <br />2.What type of access would be necessary if the <br />entire area were grassed? <br />If the entire area is grassed, this does- not <br />create a problem as long as there are no fences <br />or barricades. <br />3. Would a 10' easement be sufficient for each <br />of the utilities? <br />We would need a 20 ft. easement which is the <br />normal utility easement. <br />(Continued)
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.