My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-21-1980 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1980
>
07-21-1980 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2023 12:06:12 PM
Creation date
2/15/2023 12:04:47 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
107
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mayor Wm. Brad Van Nest July 8, 1980 <br />Page 5 <br />Judge Nicholson, who ruled that Resolution 851 <br />was valid, made several errors in his judgment. <br />One of these errors was, as he stated, "The <br />easements over the Becker and Rhode properties <br />were granted without Orono Council approval and <br />are of dubious validity" (Paragraph 23, page 4). <br />It is my understanding that Mr. Malkerson, attor* <br />ney for the City of Orono, approached my attorney, <br />Mr. Rice, and stated "Was there any way that <br />Becker would drop his appeal to the Supreme <br />Court?" Making a long story short, I agreed to <br />drop my appeal if the City of Orono stated in <br />writing that Mr. Rhode could not build unless <br />and until the easements, which the City of Orono <br />and Judge Nicholson declared invalid, were ex <br />tinguished. The City agreed to this, as I under <br />stand it, and 1 subsequently dropped my appeal <br />to the Supreme Court. Apparently, now the City <br />of Orono feels that it was mistaken in terming <br />the easements "invalid." I think the City Council <br />should reflect long and hard on the ethical and <br />legal question of offering something to Mr. Becker <br />for which it received something in return and then, <br />subsequently, "taking back" what it gave to Mr. <br />Becker in exchange for consideration, namely, the <br />dropping of a lawsuit. The Council should also <br />reflect on the fact that if it unilaterally breaks <br />its covenant with me, I am no longer impeded from <br />seeking ledress in the courts. I believe the <br />City of Orono made a "good faith" contract with <br />me for which it received consideration, and that <br />breaking this contract would be illegal. <br />Mr. Swenson presented to the Council on 6-30-80 <br />the argument that the Lauers were all in favor of <br />the new location for the Rhode house. <br />Mr. Rhode and Mr. Swenson are proposing to move <br />the Rhode house toward the lake and away from <br />the Lauer house. Obviously, the Lauers gain in <br />the value to their own home in direct proportion <br />to the distance that the Rhode home is from the <br />Lauer home. Conversely, the further away the <br />house is from the Lauers, the more it adversely <br />affects the value of the Becker home. Also, the <br />A
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.