Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />1 <br />' ! <br />Du WAYNE L. SCHIBILLA <br />CCRTiriCD PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT <br />SUITE 314. SONS OF NORWAY BUILOtNO <br />I45S WEST LAKE STREET <br />MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA SS40B <br />TfLtPMONC CSI2) B27.Satl <br />Kay 8, 1980 <br />Mr. Thomas Jacobs, Building Inspector <br />Village of Orono <br />1335 Brwn Road South <br />Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 <br />Dear Mr. Jacobs: <br />I am vjriting this letter as you suggested to document our <br />conversation of last week and my concerns over the current con~ <br />struction taking place at 3215 Crystal Bay Road (the Haverberg <br />property). <br />As I indicated to you I own the property at 3235 Crystal <br />Bay Road which shares a common property line with the "Haverberg <br />property". <br />A screen porch has been constructed over an existing slab <br />within the last year, which I do not have any problems with. My <br />concerns lie in the fact that I would not like any further improve <br />ments made upon the screen porch (i.e. a three-seasons porch or <br />permanent living space) for a number of reasons some of which are <br />as follows: <br />The existing screen porch is no more than <br />3-4 fwet from our common property line - <br />at a maximum. I am not sure this is in com­ <br />pliance with current building ordiances. I <br />am sure it would restrict anything I might <br />do to improve my own property. <br />The position of the screen porch is set <br />ahead of my house. As I indicated to you this <br />is no problem at this point in time since the <br />screen porch gives the illusion of not being <br />there (i.e. you can see through it). I would <br />not appreciate the porch being developed <br />further, as mentioned above, since it would <br />then restrict the view from my property. <br />The drainage off the porch roof must effect <br />my property simply because it is so close to <br />the lot line. <br />•V <br />■t <br />i