Laserfiche WebLink
9 <br />1 <br />? <br />)' <br />June 19, 1980 <br />Cortlen Cloutier <br />2480 Casco Point Road <br />Variance ft CUP <br />Page 2 <br />Staff's review of the application and recommendation: <br />30‘ <br />invalid if an inspection has not been called within 120 days. A <br />request for a new building permit opened the entire project up to a <br />zoning review. At this point in time a screened porch and e <br />remodelina of the second story room into a guest apartment cannot <br />fall under simple repair or alteration. In 1971 the zoning code <br />would have required a CUP for guest apartment use. ^he^athouse <br />is non-conforming because of its location within the 0-75 setback <br />area. Planning Commission should review the non-conforming use <br />sections of the zoning code (31.100 - 31.110) specifically 31.105, <br />31.108, 31.109 and 31.110. The code defines the intent and future <br />for all non-conforming uses and structures. . . . . . . to gradually <br />fade away. . . <br />The applicant can paint and repair his boathouse, ^pairs can be <br />made to the second story deck and interior room. Planning Commission <br />may grant a CUP for the applicant to construct a guest 5°“?® <br />principal structure's setbacks and most certainly out of the 0-75 <br />ledceshore setback area. Applicant would be charged for ^ additional <br />water unit and sewer unit - an additional SAC charge would alf® <br />collected with a building permit. Planning Commission may not legally <br />grant a variance to the standards set forth in the non-conforming use <br />sections of the code. <br />34'- <br />“1 h ____i <br />>£---------------------------------------------------------- > <br />7 -10 " <br />\ <br />RrepOS&D <br />Add\”V<o*4 <br />Dec<UK\ <br />I <br />A - * <br />* r.A.