Laserfiche WebLink
REGULAR MEETING OF THE ORONO COUNCIL, MARCH 30, 1978 <br />Massengale r»oved, Butler seconded, to table <br />the request of Durwell Vetter, Big Island, for <br />a subdivision until the regular Council meeting <br />of April 27, 1978. Motion, Ayes (3) - Nays (0). <br />Mr. Alan Olson, City Planner, entered into the <br />record the following information concerning the <br />Forest Arms Subdivision for Carol Sue Dongoske, <br />dated March 21, 1978, which states: <br />Sue Dongoske has requested an appearance before <br />the Council to discuss more items concerning the <br />completion of this plat. On November 14, 1977, <br />the Council referred the item to the Planning <br />Commission for recommendations concerning six <br />items. On November 21, 1977, the Planning <br />Commission requested additional information as <br />listed in Mr. Muhich's letter of November 22, 1977. <br />No information was received by the City until <br />March 6, 1978. <br />Regarding Ms. Dongoske*s letter and the previous <br />action, I recommend the following: <br />1.Building permits should not be issued until <br />the road is installed and passible. If permits <br />are considered, no permit should be issued until <br />a developers' agreement is completed and no <br />occupancy should be allowed until the road is <br />certified complete by the City Engineer. No <br />p-ermits should be issued until the Planning <br />Commission has had a chance to review all <br />pertinent information and make recommendations <br />to the Coxincil as directed on November 14, 1977. <br />2. <br />Page 4 <br />SUBDIVISION <br />Big Island <br />(Continued) <br />.J^\ <br />*^#336 <br />BDIVISION <br />Forest Arms Subdivis <br />Sue Dongoske <br />^ A^ A <br />The Planning Commission should be directed to <br />complete their study of the matter, including <br />the newly defined issue of boat dockage in the <br />channel. The applicant should be reminded that <br />reviews cannot be completed until all necessary <br />information is supplied. In particular, the <br />City has no road construction plans for the <br />Engineer to review, has no dock plans or suggested <br />layouts for the Planning Commission to review, <br />has no title opinion or other evidence of any <br />lot restrictions or covenants on the property <br />and has only poor copies of the plat and DNR <br />channel permit from which to work. <br />3.A developers* agreement and bond should be required <br />prior to any final approval. <br />4.Park dedication fees should be paid as should all <br />delinquent taxes.(Continued)