Laserfiche WebLink
• • <br />MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF NOVEMBER 16, 1981 Page 3 <br /># <br />4 - <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />Kt <br />9 <br />Legal descriptions for existing sewer line and <br />other utilities for private utility easements that <br />will run through Pluhm property. <br />Dedication on the plat of 10* on each side of the <br />existing sewer and water main locations. <br />A flowage and conservation easement over the paved <br />area (below 936 contour), culvert and ditch area. <br />A legal description of that area must be created <br />for the filings of the easement document. <br />A private driveway, ingress, egress and access <br />easement over Lot 1 in favor of Lot 2. <br />No additional hardcover allowed within the 75* - <br />250* lakeshore setback area of Lot 1. <br />Permit will be required for any work done within <br />the public right of way and all proposed future <br />improvements of driveway. <br />Goetten seconded. Vote: Ayes (7), Nays (0). <br />Applicant was present. Mabusth noted the certificate of <br />mailing and the affidavit of publication. No one was <br />present from the audience for this application. <br />Adams was concerned with an overall look at the development <br />of the property. <br />Mabusth stated that the M.C.W.D. will require a drainage <br />and grading plan for the entire developed 53 acres. <br />Rovegno questioned if it was a logical way to have through <br />streets. He asked for the planner to write a memo on the <br />City's policy concerning acceptable standards for the <br />design of plat roads and feet location for accesses on <br />public roads. <br />Opheim stated that he could not see why the lining up <br />of the streets was so important. <br />Adams noted that from a safety point of view it is <br />significant. <br />Mabusth stated that a meeting with the developer has been <br />scheduled to review the proposed pattern of roads and <br />accesses and the need for an overall drainage plan. The <br />Planner and the City Engineer will report on the outcome <br />of that meeting and make recommendations to the Planning <br />Commission at an upcoming meeting. <br />Applicant stated that if they were to change the road <br />design that they would have lots abutted by roads on <br />two sides. <br />McDonald moved to table DiCon's subdivision application <br />until staff can review it further. <br />Adams seconded. Vote: Ayes (7), Nays (0). <br />(PLUHM'C0NT;7. <br />DICON <br />2645 Watertown Rd <br />Preliminary <br />Subdivision <br />#654 <br />Public Hearing <br />8:04 - 8:05 PM