Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF OCTOBER 19, 1981 <br />he Planning Commission met on the above date. The following <br />embers were present: Chairman Hammerel, Goetten, Rovegno, <br />and McDonald. Adams arrived at 9:04 PM. CounciImember Mary <br />Butler was also present. Mabusth represented the City staff. <br />Applicant was present. Mabusth reviewed with the Planning <br />Commission the final plat of Navarre Woods. The Planning <br />Commission found no problems. <br />Hammerel moved to approve the final subdivision of David <br />Myhre subject to the findings and conditions setforth in the <br />staff resolution. <br />McDonald seconded. Vote: Ayes (4), Nays (0). <br />Richard Speeter was present. The Planning Coinmissjon wanted <br />to compare the City Engineer's comments with Mr. Gray's, <br />applicant's engineer, comments. Mabusth informed the Planning <br />Commission that there was no written comments from the City <br />Engineer but that she had talked to him. Mabusth reviewed <br />Cook's comments noting that the environmental standards of <br />the City would have prohibited the construction of the flume <br />if an adequate review had taken place. He asked to review <br />all the data that the applicant's engineer must have compiled <br />to make his recommendation. At this time he feels a more <br />etailed study of the watershed and storm sewer system should <br />e made to afford adequate review. <br />Goetten asked the applicant what the purpose of the construc­ <br />tion of the retaining wall was and if there was a building <br />permit issued? <br />Applicant stated that a building permit was not taken out <br />because he didn't know that one was required. The purpose <br />was to extend his back yard. <br />Rovegno asked the applicant if he had placed hay bales along <br />the shoreline yet? <br />Applicant stated that he had moved a pile of debris over to <br />protect the shoreline, but that he had not used hay bales. <br />Rovegno asked the applicant about the apparent tire tracks <br />on the cement slab? <br />Applicant explained that those were the tire tracks of a <br />bobcat he had rented to pick up six cement slabs near his <br />shoreline. Applicant stated that he could or would never <br />use the slab as a boat ramp. <br />Applicant stated that if the drainageway does stop his <br />^Hank from eroding why would the City ask him to tear it <br />^^ut? He stated that his engineer told him that now that <br />it is already done, it is best to leave it alone. <br />ATTENDANCE <br />7:30 PM <br />DAVID MYHRE <br />2590 Casco Point <br />Final Subdivisior <br />#614 <br />RICHARD SPEETER <br />659 Minnetonka <br />Highlands Lane <br />Conditional Use <br />Permit & Variano <br />«656 <br />1 <br />1 <br />> 1 <br />\ «