Laserfiche WebLink
•^7^ ” ,T , • ■"vr <br />MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 21, 1981 <br />The Planning Commission met on the abo'^e date. The following ATTENDANCE <br />members were present: Chairman Hammerel, Goetten, McDonald, 7:30 PM <br />Rovegno, Jabbour, and Adams. Norman Paurus was present from <br />the City Council. Jeanne Mabusth and Thomas Jacobs represented <br />the City staff. <br />Applicant was not present. Adams was concerned about the 10 JAMES MCCLEARY <br />year variance expiration. Staff noted that it would be reason- 3445 Bayside Rd. <br />able to assume that in the future, if the lots were not built on Final Subdivisior <br />the City would likely follow the same pattern in granting the #589 variance. <br />Goetten asked if there were any park dedication fees. Mabusth <br />stated that Council waived the park fees. <br />Hammerel moved to approve the McCleary final subdivision <br />subject to the findings and c editions setforth in the staff <br />resolution. <br />McDonald seconded. Vote: Ayes (f), Nays (0). <br />Charles Van Eeckhout was present. Adams wanted to know how C.E. VAN EECKHOU1 <br />the line of the wetland was determined. Van Eeckhout stated that 1025 North Brown <br />the actual wetland is a meandering line but a straight line was Preliminary <br />drawn for simple description purposes. Adeuns questioned how <br />wide the road was that serves the 7 lots. Van Eeckhout stated <br />the road outlot is 50' wide with a 100' cul de sac but that <br />^)the finished road surface would be about 20'. <br />Subdivision <br />#626 <br />Jabbour noted that Lot 1 lacked the necessary 200' width along <br />the proposed road but since the average lot widths of the remaining <br />6 lots is adequate and did not appear a problem especially since <br />there is some 400' of frontage along Brown Road. <br />Adams moved to approve the 7 Lot plat of Charles Van Eeckhout <br />in granting a lor width variance to Lot 1 based on the <br />following hardships: <br />1 - Adequate 465' of lot side yard along Brown Road <br />2 - There is adequate width 112' along building line in <br />consideration of the 50 and 30 ft side yard setback.m <br />such approval is subject to the following finding: <br />^^**1 “ All lots meet the standards of the City's on site septic <br />code and that each lot meets the lot standards of the RR-lB <br />zoning district. <br />and subject to the following conditions: <br />% <br />O <br />1 - City to take underlying road and utilities easements <br />over Outlot A - road outlot <br />2 - City will require applicant to enter into a maintenance <br />agreement to divide cost of upkeep and maintenance of <br />said road between all seven lots.