Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF AUGUST 17, 1981 Page 8 <br />(CONT.) <br />s <br />.<si <br />FORCIER <br />rth Arm Dr <br />e <br />Applicant was not present. Mabusth noted that the following <br />^information must be submitted prior to any action taken by <br />the Planning Commission: <br />1 - Exact area of the v^etlands <br />2 - Amount of spoils removed <br />3 - Metes and bounds legal description for the filing <br />of a conservation and flowage easement <br />4 - Surveyor's sketch of the wetland area. <br />No action required. <br />Andrew Benson and Dave Moore were present. This application <br />involves the proposed private raquetball club in a B-5 <br />limited commercial zoning district. Applicants plan to limit <br />the membership to 400. <br />Mabusth.noted that clubs like this are only addressed in a <br />residential district through a conditional use permit. How <br />does the Planning Commission feel that this type of use fits <br />in the existing neighborhood residential district? <br />In review of the parking required for private tennis clubs, <br />49 stalls are required. Planning Commission noted that they <br />were very much for this kind of application and that they <br />:could easily see this use in the limited neighborhood <br />^commercial district, but that the lot is physically too <br />small. They advised the applicants to look for another <br />site. <br />No action required. <br />Mr. and Mrs. Crosby were present. Applicant reviewed with the <br />Planning Commission the history of the 40 plus acre property. <br />Access to the property is via an old public cartway 33' in <br />width. The plat will involve a road outlot. The Crosby's <br />stated that they would like to start building as soon as <br />possible. <br />Mabusth noted that though there were two legal different <br />properties that the proposed house was located 20' from <br />the property line. The zoning district requires 30'. <br />The location of the caretaker house and the nearest of the <br />proposed Crosby homes would suggest that there would be no <br />problem with early removal of the caretaker house. <br />Planning Commission should come up with a recommendation <br />concerning the issuance of a building permit at the time <br />of preliminary approval. <br />r ifi public hearing was scheduled for September 21, 1981 at <br />7:30 PM. <br />JAMES THAXTER <br />1065 Tamarack Dr <br />Conditional Use <br />Permit <br />#644 <br />ANDREW BENSON <br />3542 Shoreline D <br />Conditional Use <br />Permit <br />#646 <br />• . 1 <br />THOMAS CROSBY ,SR <br />745 Spring Hill <br />Subdivision <br />Sketch Plan <br />#647