Laserfiche WebLink
K <br />I <br />MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF JULY 20, 1981 Page 2 <br />0^oth applicants stated that the increase in taxes have forced <br />hem to apply for a lot area and lot width variance. It was <br />noted for the record that the applicants had read the planner's <br />memo prior to the Planning Commission's action. <br />Rovegno moved to deny these variance applications subject to <br />the substandard lot width and lot area and based on the lack <br />of sufficient hardship and findings noted in the planner's <br />■gm <br />memo: <br />2) <br />3) <br />4) <br />5) <br />m <br />The owners have received substantial benefit in the <br />use of these lots for private lakeshore access <br />purposes. <br />A substantial property value remains in each lot <br />since it can be sold for combination with the other. <br />These individual lots are not unique or special <br />since all nearby building sites (except Heit lot 8) <br />have been created by combination of 2 or more lots <br />similar to these. <br />Neither lot has been assessed for sewer as a separate <br />building site. <br />Granting of two adjacent 50' lakeshore lotsLn a <br />140 ft minimum district is contrary to the intent <br />of the zoning code. Combination into one 100 ft. <br />wide lot would at least meet the minimum DNR shore- <br />land management regulations, the LR-IC h acre dis­ <br />trict lot width, and be similar to most nearby lakeshore <br />lot widths. <br />Frahm seconded. Vote: Ayes (6), Nays (0). <br />Applicant seeks a 5 ft. variance from the street for the <br />locating of a detached garage. The proposed location ...11 <br />afford the necessary 30 ft. turnaround to prevent the <br />backing out onto Rest Point Lane. The applicant will be ‘ <br />responsible for relocating the gas line. <br />RICHARD P. MICH <br />1373 Rest Point Lr <br />Variance <br />#631 <br />Jabbour noted that the location of the gas line is not a <br />hardship. <br />The applicant noted the following hardhsips: <br />1) several mature trees <br />2) steep topography <br />3) location of existing structures <br />Frahm moved to approve the 5 ft. setback variance based on <br />the hardships stated above and subject to the gai line <br />being relocated. <br />r - : \1 <br />McDonald seconded. Vote: Ayes (6), Nays (0). <br />O