Laserfiche WebLink
• • <br />MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF JUNE 15, 1981 Page 8 <br />o <br />Q <br />Staff advised the Planning Conunission that some kind of <br />irection should be given so that the applicant <br />ould now direct an architect to draft a site plan noting <br />a.i 1 the physical improvements to the site. <br />PARKVIEW (CONT.) <br />Planning Commission voted 5 to 1 - abstaining <br />Jabbour noted the following reasons for giving conceptual <br />action approval. <br />1) Limit to a 36 bed facility <br />2) Access to facility must be off Highway 12, based on <br />plan #6 <br />3) Septic system to meet all state and local ordinances <br />4) No lake access such as docks or boats. <br />5) Deed covenants involving abutting property owners noting <br />all these limitations. <br />6) Staff limited to the following 16 hours shifts: <br />16 hour period - 2 daytime shifts <br />1 staff person to 3 patients ratio <br />8 hour night shift <br />(1 staff person to 10 patients) <br />limiting staff to a total of 27 per day <br />Rovegno, his abstention based on the fact that he had no <br />substantial opinion at this time of the review. <br />{^^ams moved to table the application to give the applicant <br />^Hbime to prepare a site plan and to meet all those require­ <br />ments previously stated by the Planning Commission. <br />Frahm seconded. Vote: Ayes.(6), Nays (0). <br />Hammerel moved to table Thomas Rudd's Conditional Use <br />Permit application at the request of the applicant. <br />The application will be scheduled for the July 20, 1981 <br />meeting. <br />Goetten seconded. Vote: Ayes (6), Nays (0). <br />Applicant was present. Mabusth noted that in review of <br />the original plat of Underwood Farms there was no con­ <br />servation and flowage easement at the time of the plat, <br />but that we were dealing with a designated wetland. <br />Veon described the previous condition of the area, that <br />had snakes and misquitos and that a large portion of his <br />property was unusable and that the wetlands were created <br />by an old faulty drainage tile system. Originally the <br />tiles were to drain under County Road 6 and into Long <br />Lake. He was not aware of the need for a Conditional <br />Use Permit, and he feels that he has created a more at­ <br />tractive environment now advantageous to wildlife. <br />Rovegno noted that there should be special fees charged <br />for these "after the tact" Conditional Use Permits, not <br />necessarily a penalty but a greater fee paid. <br />PfP:- <br />act; ' - • / <br />a:;'' <br />THOMAS RUDD <br />1325 Shoreline Dr. <br />Conditional Use <br />Permit <br />#624 <br />ROGER VEON <br />1330 Sixth Ave. No. <br />Conditional Use <br />Permit <br />#625