Laserfiche WebLink
#615 Ringer Subdivision <br />#616 Parkview Treatment Center <br />Page 4 <br />The Rebers property will also be developed sometime. Considera­ <br />tion must be given now to any need for interrelating access be­ <br />tween the Ringer and Rebers parcels, particularly because Reber <br />has very limited access locations available. Brown Road has 1 <br />good and 3 fair locations dictated by sight distance on the rolling <br />profile. Highway 12 has very poor access to the Reber land <br />because of a hill and curve. <br />Drawings 2-5 attached suggest some designs for alternative ac­ <br />cessing to the Ringer and Rebers properties. In all cases, <br />the suggested road location is different than on the proposed <br />May 7, 1981, drawing. Note that all suggestions separate Park- <br />view (and Ringer lab?) traffic from residential traffic, which <br />is not done on the existing proposal except by unacceptable mul­ <br />tiple direct access onto highway 12. <br />Future Changes <br />The proposed Parkview facilities are all clustered in one area <br />of the 28 acres site. Future economic or social changes may <br />affect long term operation of the facility as proposed. <br />If the 28 acres site remains zoned RR—IB residential, the poten­ <br />tial remians for future subdivision into 2 acre lots, either of <br />all or a portion of the site. Even with open space easements, <br />there may be future pressure to subdivide off several lots while <br />retaining this principle use, or at the time this use might <br />be converted into something else. <br />One cannot foresee every possibility. However, permanent <br />cisions such as platting approvals and road locations must take <br />into account these concerns, and must allow flexibility to meet <br />unseen future changes. <br />My professional recommendation is to revise this proposed sub­ <br />division as follow^: <br />Reguire a road system that will reasonably serve all future <br />development of the land abutting highway 12 via limited, <br />well-located "street" accesses instead of direct curb-cuts. <br />Consider the implications, location and design of a new public <br />street to serve the Parkview (and other non-single family <br />residential) uses as dictated by the high TPD traffic count. <br />Note, public streets are often more desireable for mainten­ <br />ance if looped or thru design rather than cul de sac. <br />Consider allowing for future interconnection with roads in the <br />Rebers property. <br />i