Laserfiche WebLink
TO;Planning Commission <br />FROM:Jeanne A. Mabusth <br />DATE;April 30, 1981 <br />SUBJECT: #607 Robert G. Bredeson - Variance <br />Comparison of hardcover <br />Existing house <br />Proposed house <br />1965 sf (including driveway) <br />3467 sf <br />a) 440 sf - add to above figure for proposed <br />driveway location <br />b) 250 sf - if driveway located no more than <br />25' from cul de sac <br />Hardcover - Proposed house <br />0-75' - 2667 sf <br />75' - 250' - 800 sf <br />Setback Comparison <br />Proposed house - never closer than recomirended 40' <br />Existing house - 36' on west shoreline <br />Staff Comments <br />1) House could be relocated closer to cul de sac - 35' recommended. <br />This location would meet front (street) setback standard, <br />protect lakeview of houses to north and be more in keeping <br />with average lakeshore setback requirement for new construction. <br />The house is very ambitious given the size and lakeshore set­ <br />back limitations. If approved the applicant must be made aware <br />that the City will allow no additional accessory hardcover. If <br />there are to be defined walkways, they must be pervious to water <br />such as crushed natural stone. In addition, no other accessory <br />structure will be allov/ed on property - nor to remain. <br />Review of above <br />1) Move house west to meet 35' setback from cul de sac <br />2) Ask for removal of any sheds, accessory structures or paved <br />areas on site <br />3) Any additional improvements on site must be pervious to water <br />Ask applicant to consider a reduction in size of proposed house <br />because you doubt if Council will approve such an ambitious <br />proposal for thii size lot. Don't hold applicantions up but <br />make recommendation to Council.