My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-16-1981 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1981 Planning Packets
>
03-16-1981 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2023 11:10:18 AM
Creation date
2/15/2023 11:09:53 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br />TO;Jeanne A. Mabusth <br />FROM:Alan P. Olson <br />DATE:March 11, 1981 <br />SUBJECT: #568 Navarre Cove Subdivision/PRD <br />This proposal dates way back to the original Kelley Avenue <br />subdivision application. Note the Planning Coiuinission minutes <br />of April 10, 1976, where zero lot line duplexes were discussed. <br />The original subdivision #104 created lot #1 with 3,2 acres <br />and one existing, non-conforming duplex. Thereafter, in <br />October 1977, Planning Commission and Council approved Conditional <br />Use Permits for both PRD (3 buildings on the same lot) and <br />duplex credit (2 units in each building). The net density was <br />6 units on 3.2 acres. <br />In 1979, Subdivision #448 was approved v;here in each separate <br />duplex building was located on a separate lot. <br />Now the applicant wants to combine the 2 north lots into one <br />outlot and create a zero lot line PRD so that each dwelling <br />unit is on a distinct property. Each unit would own 1/4 <br />undivided interest in the common outlot. <br />Lot 3 of Navarre Cove with the non-conforming duplex is not <br />included. As with any non-conforming use, if this duplex <br />is ever destroyed, it can only be replaced with one single <br />family home meeting all current setbacks. <br />This proposal does not increase the number of dwelling units <br />nor does it prevent rental of any unit. It does allow con <br />dominium ownership. In one way, it improves zoning compliance <br />over the status quo, to wit: The 1979 subdivision created <br />a lot containing a duplex, which lot did not abut the commercial <br />zone. By recombination into Outlot A, owned in part by the <br />owners of units 3 and 4, that duplex again more closely fits <br />the standards contained in the duplex credit section. <br />Ownership option is the only issue in this proposal. Density <br />was decided in 1977 when the original Conditional Use Permits <br />were issued. The homeowner's agreement and chain-of-title <br />can control joint use of the parking and open space, and <br />can limit development to the attached dwellings as exist today.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.