01-19-1981 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. • • s*. * n‘ m 9i »«■ \'i'> V,- *• . i\ •«» . 2^* .'#> V • «ir*u' •• <f • • i V. atit ) • •1m A* ll \ }•V U 1 t <<• \N ../ :\ l.'r.12. TO: FRCW: MTE: Planning Conunlssion and Council Jeanne Mabusth January 14, 1981 SUBJECT: #596 John Muehlberg and John Arnott, 3220 Navarre Lane Conditional Use Permit Zoning District LR-IC Area — Approzimately 5000 sq. ft. Work Session The applicants are applying for a conditional use permit and several variances for the purpose of constructing a duplex in the old Viking Rubber building on Navarre Lane. For those members idio do not remember the Proudfit application (#459), I have enclosed a deed restriction filed by the City against the subject property. Briefly, Proudfit operated a small, light industrial operation in the building located on Navarre Lane. The surrounding new development and parking problems caused by the Viking employees created a situation that resulted in the operation being closed down. Council determined that the existing building could only be for residential use. I had asked the applicants to check with the surrounding land owners to see if additional land could be acquired. I have advised from the beginning that a duplex's parking demands could never be satisfied by the existing lot. The property is not adjacent to commercial zone, nor would the duplex be 200 feet from commercial zone (see plat map). They received a negative response from the landowners. They are still determined to proceed with an application that will require several variances to the zoning code. excellent condition the City would be rid Staff has noted the It is their position that the existing structure is in and could easily be adapted to a duplex. Applicants contend of a long running problem by assuring the residential use. following concerns: 1. Offstreet parking limitations 2. Garage doors located 9 ft off street rl^t of way 3. Refueling area located some 20 ft. to the west of proposed residence 4. Wetlands to rear prevent any rear expansion I have designated the only offstreet parking area available on site (review survey). A parking stall is required to be at least 9' x 20'. The duplex conversion plans are impossible to reproduc«> for the packets. Applicant will furnish additional copies by action meeting. List of variances: 5. 34.552 34.029 37.150 38.200 38.201 38.507 area variance duplex credit traffic control required setbacks for parking Driveways ’ i tscrrlbe EFFECT OF PROPOSED WORK o« Mltt>borliis propertU. ana oe thm Bclghborhood fji ganaral: ^^ t - -‘-t- LL..,L.r. V .. Tho APPLICANT and tha PROPERTY OWWFR m...#- 1' ^ .H.- an- ^.h., to thla appU«,|a" rh»a*i* fr** f"'*''’' tncun Jd ’ )t Datv >P.i Slgnatu* ‘Date ■aiiaBi; ...........- i