My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-19-1982 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1982
>
04-19-1982 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2023 11:01:09 AM
Creation date
2/15/2023 10:59:24 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
159
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
L <br />Jean Mabusth <br />April 2, 1982 <br />page 2 <br />Riparian Rights. Outlet A as shown on the proposed plat is <br />intended by the Gregorys to be utilized for boat docking purposes <br />as to proposed Lot 1. Outlet B would be reserved for possible <br />boat docking privileges for the benefit of Lot 4 if Lot 4 chose <br />to locate its dock on the main lake instead of Tanagor Lake. We <br />understand that# subject to these boat docking and riparian <br />rights# Orono will require some sort of conservation easement. <br />Dedication of Highway. It is the desire of the Gregorys and the <br />Duffs to dedicate to the public a right-of-way for County Road 15 <br />as follows: <br />As to the northerly (Gregory) portion of the proposed <br />plat# there would be dedicated a 66-foot wide right-of-way <br />for County Road 15. <br />As to the southerly (Duff) portion of the proposed plat# <br />the parties propose to dedicate only that land actually <br />being used by County Road 15, including hardcover# shoulders, <br />and ditches. It is my understanding that this amounts to <br />approximately 58 feet. Please note that the adjacent <br />property to the south reached a settlement a month or so <br />ago to dedicate only 55 feet to the county. <br />Change in Lot Lines. Because of the unique geography of the <br />property# there is some difficulty locating building sites that <br />lay out in a way amenable to construction of homes. The Gregorys <br />are planning to build a garage on Lot 3 and build their own home <br />on Lot 2. After viewing the sketches of the Gregorys' architect# <br />it occurred to me that there might# in fact# be a problem with <br />boundary lines and set-back requirements. I would propose that <br />the boundary line between Lots 2 and 3 be modified slightly so <br />that the westerly boundary between those lots be moved westward <br />lightly so that there would be a ten-foot set-back between the <br />proposed garage to be built on Lot 3 and the boundary line. The <br />set-back of the house on Lot 2 would be twenty-five feet from the <br />property line between Lots 2 and 3. As to the swimming pool# the <br />architect feels that it could be relocated so that no variance <br />from the seventy-five (75) foot lake set-back would be needed. <br />I have met with Mark Granberg of Gordon Coffin's office and he is <br />preparing a revised preliminary plat showing the new lot line and <br />new acreage figures. Moving the westerly boundary of Lot 3 <br />should have the effect of increasing the dry, buildable acreage <br />of Lot 3# making that lot closer to standard size. This was not <br />done previously in as much as there was some doubt as to whether <br />there would be adequate area on Lot 2 in which to build the house <br />planned by the Gregorys. <br />i
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.