Laserfiche WebLink
f <br />i-i- <br />TO;Planning Commission <br />FROM:Jeanne A. Mabusth <br />DATE:December 3, 1982 <br />;SUBJECT: ,4*#719 Thomas E. McCue <br />Zoning District - LR-IC <br />Area - 21,720 s£ <br />Application - setback variance from accessory structure <br />Per Ordinance 31.370 required » 10' <br />proposed » 7.2' <br />variance « 2.8' or 28% <br />The applicant is a new owner of the subject property and plans <br />to construct a 7.5'+ 30' addition to the rear of house. Given <br />the interior floor plan the rear extension is the only feasible <br />way to expand. McCue's position is that a jog in that addition <br />ruin the exterior design, specifically the roof line and <br />the proposed interior design. The garage, built in 1969, was <br />located at the required minimum setback of 10' preventing any <br />complete rear extension in the future. <br />T1»e intent of Ordinance 31.370 is not merely to provide easy <br />access for emergency vehicles to service principal structures <br />but as its title suggests to provide the desired level of open <br />space for residential development. <br />Get out on the site. Access is acheived via an alley along the <br />railroad. Hardcover is no problem; the lot is larger than <br />neighboring lots. Hardcover is clustered to rear of lot. <br />If approved, your finding may include the following: <br />1 - Exterior and interior design of house would be <br />sacrificed if minimum standard of code is required. <br />2 “ Garage located on site so that a con^lete rear <br />addition would require a setback variance. <br />3 ~ Satisfactory area surrounds principal structure <br />for emergency vehicles to service. <br />4 - Hardcover clustered to rear of lot providing sufficient <br />open space. <br />If denied refer to Ordinance 32.340 for required findings. <br />1