My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-20-1982 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1982
>
09-20-1982 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2023 10:59:55 AM
Creation date
2/15/2023 10:58:04 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
117
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
exhibit £d <br />Ally 31, 1980 >^700 <br />Hr* Aon Haine <br />Dixnefaor of Pzoncorty Taisatian <br />A-G <br />ESannepin Gbunty Oovemnent Osnter <br />Mimoap^is, HinnesoOa 55437 <br />-------- <br />AttentLonx Oaoxge Richey <br />RB: Tkact V, Aegdatexod Zand Survey No. 461, Hennsln Oounty, Minnesota <br />Dear Mr* nicheyx <br />X repcBSoA Mr. P. Gary Petersen vto is tiie mner of lot 194 and part of lot 185, <br />Suibdivision of ^irln^ Park Lots, Kenneoin Oounty, Ilinnssota is <br />adjacent to tiie above described property. On the enclooad loas, wf <br />eliant's lot is outlined in blue and tiie above lot is outlined in ted, As you <br />know, the Above lot is tax forfeited and is being held by the county with the <br />EUR having an indefinite hold on the property. I understand that a noertineT is <br />to be held in the near future to determine the disposition of this lot. <br />Oi hrtialf of ijy client, I am requesting Hennepin county to this lot to irv <br />fdlcifit; oar in the alternative, to lease said lot to xxy client for a of at <br />least 31 yaars. ^ 1977 ity client requested sesncral'varianoes from the City of <br />Oram in order to build a house on his lot. Cit^' nminrHi felt that the best <br />BEnroach was to oorfaine Tract V with ry client's lot bo fcaan one site. <br />fV client has atterptad to acquire •mit V since that tine but with no suceess. * <br />I've been in ocntact vd.th both Janes Blooningdale, Regional Land Specialist for <br />the nm, and RlxShard Uessberg, Attorney for the CNR, Ox> advise ce that tha TKR <br />would nob imhsan t, to a sale of that lot because of the restrictions of Minnesota <br />Stat uta $282.018, but wrxxld have no objection to a long tesn lease arrangsnent. <br />The taxm of tixa lease vnuld of necessity have to be at least for 30 vears in <br />order to gualiiV ^or a nortgaoe ooirdtrent. <br />I have also been advised ly it:. Sruoe Hal kerson, City 7ittomey far the City of <br />ttoxo, that the dt/ vnuld not alia/ an/ public \ise of Tract V Iv the EUR, tiut <br />the Citi' vnuld not alio/ a dock to be plaoad on that lot without a (t-nllincr <br />plaood thereon, and also that the lot is unbuildable unless it x«ro joined'with <br />W client's lot. <br />1
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.