Laserfiche WebLink
■ .<';>■ <br />iM>J^ \\lli i <br />i <br />- A-. v':'*- ■;•••'• :•■ ■•'"• <br />•■; >. ■ ’ •; it-iV'• , - ' <br />.♦ IV <br />'•V <br />'■ <br />fV^:‘ _______________ <br />t;. ■■’ :• i>i tho at'..:” <br />« b-’. rj'. i <br />tt. .tMy !►: '> <br />FROM* l^h.v * • <br />planning Commission Members <br />'■• » i fa *?■'»,. <br />■■.!. •■'».• r'Or . <br />V#* ; <br />Jeanne Mabu'*th, Zoning Administrator <br />DATE:Septesiber 16, 1982 <br />SUBJECT:1700 - Thomas Vickerman - 679 Minnetonka Highlands La. <br />After-the>fact Conditional Use Permit and Variance <br />. ■ <br />lotting District LR>1B <br />Anplioation <br />a) Conditional Use Permit per Ordinance 31.700 - Ordinance 31.832(b)(8) <br />for construction of retaining wall within 0-75* and 75'-250* <br />Variance per Ordinance 31.831, 34.201, 34.202 <br />1. Lakesliore setback <br />required - 75* <br />proposed - 68* deck - spaced wooden <br />proposed - 0* cement pad paving starting at shoreline <br />2. Hardcover - 0-75* setback area <br />-75*-250* setback area <br />Setback area <br />0-75* <br />Total Area <br />11,025 s£ <br />Allowed Hardcover Existing <br />0 0 <br />Proposed <br />75 •-250*'^ <br />500 sf or <br />4.5% <br />24,850 sf 6213 sf 8952 sf or <br />36%948 sf or <br />3.8% <br />In t)ie spring of 1981, Vickerman inq>roved his lakeshore property without <br />the benefit of a building permit. The la)ceshore improvements consisted <br />of retaining walls, cement pad access stars and a detached, spaced, <br />wooden, two-tier deck area. The deck required a building permit. The <br />retaining walls and associated land alteration required conditional use <br />patmits. If staff had had the opportunity to advise the applicant, <br />certainly, a more environmentally acceptable construction of the access <br />stairs would have been reconmnded. <br />I have reviewed the site with Glenn Cook; and as before with other after <br />the fact applications, %«e would strongly recommend that the retaining <br />walls with stabilised plantings be allowed to stay based on negative <br />environmental affects if required to be removed. There is no question <br />that the walls have seemed to stabilise the steep lakeshore banks. <br />i:&'V • /’< <br />.-a