Laserfiche WebLink
Pheasant Lawn Area Residents <br />September 16» 1982 <br />Page 2 <br />Table reviewing potential new building sites based on LR-IC zoning <br />standards <br />Lots New Building Sites <br />2 6 3 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />20 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />33 <br />2 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />13 potential new sites <br />in review of the pertinent sections Planning Commission <br />S*SiS2SnS issues that »..ber. <br />feel should be addressed at this work sessxon. <br />a) <br />b) <br />Does the subiect area meet this standard? ^ <br />^es Se proposed area for rezoning offer special physical <br />Characteristicsor environmental concerns? <br />le rtrlattern of neic,hborhood development within the 9iven <br />«e“LSilar to that of Casco Point or Navarre Heights <br />neighborhood? <br />IS this request consistent with the intent of Jhe Coi^ehensive <br />iSnageSe” Plan standards for urban lakeshore development? <br />If approved, how would you deny similar reroning requests in other <br />LR-IB or LR-IA zoning districts? <br />Are the boundaries of this area to be rezoned realistic? Would <br />this rezoning be considered spot zoning? <br />Nhat affects would this rezoning have on the surrounding one acre, <br />LR-IB district? <br />application?