Laserfiche WebLink
)}i-1 K* <br />'0 <br />r>*b <br />NZliUTES OF THE PLMmiNG COHMiSSZON NBBTZNG OF JULY 19* 1982 Page 12 <br />Ophela stated that approval of this application depended <br />on whether or nht this issue falls under the wetlands <br />ordinance. <br />HIHU4NIC (OOH»Vx^ « <br />65** V <br />Nabusth stated that the wetlands ordinance does apply. <br />./V''"‘T <br />Ophsim stated that it would be ecologically better to ^ ® <br />keep it natural habitat - not a wetlands area. <br />n <br />HcDonald stated that 6,000 yards of dirt being excavated <br />out of there you would be ruining the natural filtration <br />process into Lake Minnetonka. <br />Kelley stated that it is a tretlands and that it should <br />be enforced under the tietlands ordinances of the City. <br />Hineline asked why they were against the wildlife pond. <br />He noted that OMR and NCND approved of this why wouldn't <br />the City Council approve of this. <br />Rovegno noted this only wetlands application which was <br />approved was ths Orono Schools^ which was used for <br />educational purposes. <br />A poll was taken by the Planning Oosnisiion as whether <br />they thought the application could be reocsssended for <br />approval. <br />Kelley felt it was a wetlands area and should be enforced <br />through the wetlands ordinances. <br />Goetten stated that this was definitely a wetlands area <br />and that excavation and alteration of wetlands is not <br />allowed. She noted that 6,000 yards was a lot of dirt <br />to be renoved. <br />Opheie felt the wetlands should not be disturbed. <br />Rovegno questioned if it is a designated wetlands - he <br />doesn't believe that these two lots are even buildable. <br />Bineline noted once again that the Council approved <br />of the plat in 1978 and these are officially buildable <br />lots. <br />Mo Action Required. <br />i <br />wm-.mm. <br />t:-; •wiiM <br />r7 ¥ <br />-I"'-T <br />' V <br />.r. <br />■ -Xf: <br />: -'j.'mM-M' <br />rwf’v-. ^ <br />--.t, -- -TJietlf mit iWl