My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-19-1982 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1982 Planning Packets
>
07-19-1982 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2023 10:57:31 AM
Creation date
2/15/2023 10:56:36 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-i <br />- ■ ? <br />•V <br />TO:Planning Commission <br />FROM:Jeanne A. Mabusth <br />DATE:July 14, 1982 <br />SUBJECT: #694 Thomas R. Sarenpa, 1670 Shadywood Road <br />Variance <br />Zoning District - LR-IC <br />Area of Lot - 14,625 sf <br />Application - request to expand on non conforming accessory <br />structure - requiring setback variances (side * street) <br />a) Side Setback <br />required 10* <br />proposed 3.1' <br />variance 6.9* or 69% <br />b) Street Setback <br />required 30' <br />proposed 18' <br />variance 12' or 40% <br />Hardcover Review <br />a) 0-75 area 4650 sf <br />existing hardcover 100 sf or 2.1% <br />b) 75'-250' area 9975 sf <br />existing hardcover 3300 sf or 33% <br />allowed hardcover 2494 sf or 25% <br />proposed additional hardcover 478 sf (19.9* x 24') or 5% <br />Total Proposed Hardcover 3778 sf <br />The proposed addition to the existing garage trill also include <br />major structural repair to the existing garage such as an entire <br />new foundation. I have advised the applicant that I could not <br />recommend approval of major repairs of a non conforming structure <br />that encroaches 7* into the County Road right of way. In fact, <br />I further advised Sarenpa that even if major structural repair <br />were not required for the existing garage that I could not <br />recommend attaching a major addition of equal size to a structure <br />encroaching 7* into the County right of way. <br />It was my recommendation to move the existing structure at the <br />time the foundation is replaced attaching the additional stalls <br />and locating the entire structure at least 5* (same as garage <br />to south of shared turnaround) off County right of way with all <br />doors facing away from street. Sarenpa stated my proposal vfould <br />be too costly and that he would lose a mature tree located <br />approximately 20* to 25* to the east of existing garage. After <br />I inspected the site, it would appear that the applicant's two <br />stall addition will either require the removal of the tree or <br />cause its demise. The applicant asked if he could still apply <br />a s*r»/< nIenH hi q to the Council. <br />■SUM
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.