My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-21-1982 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1982
>
06-21-1982 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2023 10:57:56 AM
Creation date
2/15/2023 10:56:22 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
98
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF MAY 17, 1982 Pa<ie 5 <br />Phil Caloy noted that they have had problem in the <br />past with that system. He noted that the building had <br />been vacant since this last winter. He felt the <br />drainfield was ok but that he didn't know if there <br />was any real septic tanks. <br />DEMALIGNON(COMT) <br />Mabusth stated that there couldn't be any other <br />expansion of the building if there was already <br />existing septic problems. <br />Applicant stated that he would prefer that the Planning <br />Commission approve the addition and then they could <br />take care of the septic problems. <br />Mabusth noted that if the Planning Commission <br />approved a holding tank that they would need a <br />variance to the code. <br />Rovegno asked the applicant what the extra space <br />would do for the applicant? <br />Applicant stated that right now it is too small <br />and that it would help the resale value. <br />Goetten moved to table the application of Doug <br />DeMalignon pending additional information from <br />staff regarding the septic problems. <br />Callahan seconded. Vote: Ayes (4), Nays (0). <br />Applicant asked the Planning Commission to reconsider <br />their motion because of his pressing time schedule. <br />He felt that the proposed addition wouldn't have <br />any affect on the existing septic system and that <br />the septic problems could always be worked out. <br />Planning Commission noted for the applicant that <br />they can not approve any addition for the building <br />until they have all the correct information about <br />the "failing" system. <br />Roger Wolthe represented the applicant. Roger <br />noted that Lyle Johnson still lives in Wisconsin <br />and that this house had been in his family since <br />1901. The applicant wanted to move out here and <br />move back into the home that he was raised in. <br />LYLE K. JOHNSON <br />1398 Rest Point Road <br />Variance <br />#682 <br />Pat Walsh of 1396 Rest Point Road was present from <br />the audience for this application. He stated that <br />they were delighted that they were proposing to <br />improve the house but that he opposed to the side setback variance. <br />Roger Wolthe stated that they would add to the <br />upstairs a guest room and a sewing room and that the <br />house would be resided too. <br />Pat Walsh stated that if this variance was approved <br />that it would block his view and his plans for future <br />expansion plans. He stated that he felt that the house <br />i' <br />w.^ 'AJI r.t^' 1
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.