Laserfiche WebLink
“1 <br />•690 Erwin Martin <br />Page 2 <br />Conmercial Site Plan Review <br />?ir <br />:t‘ 3 - Parking needs are well satisfied with the existing parking <br />on the site. <br />4 - Drainage should be directed away from the wetlands to the <br />east. <br />s«MS' <br />The Zoning Code requires a minimum setback of 10' bet%reen <br />structures. The Building Code requires a minimum of 6' <br />separation and if it is less a fire wall will be required. <br />Staff would recomsiend to both applicant and the Planning <br />Comsiission that the individual five sheds be constructed <br />as one unit, ffe are aware of filling being done sometiM <br />in the past in the proposed location for the sheds which <br />will either require greater expense to owner in order to <br />meet construction standards setforth by building code <br />for floating slabs or because of the extent of fill may be <br />not allowed at all. Soil borings can be done to confirm <br />the extent of the filling. Staff would recommend a single <br />structure requiring, frost footings based on the unstable <br />conditions of the soils and for the maintenance of the <br />"nnsthetic profile* of the Navarre Business District. <br />Thi* property is the gatway to beautiful do%mtown Navarre. <br />Ihese same concerns were raised when Tyra's Super Value <br />was rebuilt. <br />% <br />JK:t <br />I1» <br />Review of Issues to be resolved by Planning Commission: <br />1 - Use 20sq>atible with station use? - B-1 Zoning District? <br />2 • Is there a need to amend the code? . ^ <br />3 - Aesthetic question - single unit vs five individual units? <br />4 - Additional improvements on site - need for curb cuts? <br />5 Detennine setbacks for structures: <br />a) 15* or 20* from east property line. <br />b) if individual structures - separation setback - 10* <br />■0 <br />as required by zoning code or 6* by building code.S '*: <br />V <br />5^