Laserfiche WebLink
■. <br />#683 Doug DeMalignon <br />Pago 2 <br />Variance <br />Is there a point at which all structural expansion nust be <br />curtailed on substandard sites with severely limited septic <br />areas? Nust all expansion for sosie properties be restricted <br />until served by sewer. If you are to make a recommendation of <br />denial» you must make findings that will prove the proposal to <br />be potentially detrimental to the public health* safety and welfare. <br />If the application is to be approved* you may consider the <br />following: <br />Td approve an 8* x 30* addition involving expansion of an existing <br />bedroom and livingroom to the principal structure at 1380 Arbor <br />Street based on the following findings and hardships: <br />1 <br />/ 4 <br />i' -’'ir . ' 5.’ <br />1 • Mo additional land available. <br />2 - Established residence for over 50 years. <br />3 - Expansion will create no additional demands on existing <br />substandard septic system. <br />■j <br />4 - The proposed improvements will have no negative effect <br />on the public health* safety and %relfare. <br />approval is subject to the following conditions: <br />A X - Existing drainfield must be staked and protected during <br />construction. <br />■ 2* - Owner is placed on notice that based on the substandard <br />.. lot area and inability to expand septic system* the City <br />will not approve any future expansion of the principal <br />structure. <br />. i* ' <br />- 4 <br />A <br />^ ' / <br />vr <br />/ <br />•iT Ik <br />A’ <br />N»>rinni|iNNf; = <br />■ ■i <br />I'H <br />^ :: <br />V >