Laserfiche WebLink
' V <br />r'i', <br />r ' <br />#677 Gregory/Duff <br />Page 2 <br />Septic Systems Review <br />*T* <br />Lot 4 - Existing house has existing drainfield which extends into <br />proposed Lot 3 and which is currently failing. Assuming that <br />sewer is not made available to this lot, a new system is needed <br />now. Based on the new primary and alternate sites tested, drainfield <br />will be located only 50* from the well (Legal by state code, Orono <br />code requires 75'). Location of existing septic tanks would <br />necessitate a pump in the system, and condition of existing tanks <br />is unknown. Although the soils appear capable of handling a septic <br />system, I recommend that a detailed, scale site plan be submitted <br />now, showing exact locations and design of proposed tanks and <br />drainfield for this 4>S bedroom home. I am particularly concerned <br />whether the necessary 1300-1600 sf or trench drainfield can be <br />fit into the primary site. Also I'll note for the record that <br />if a future well is drilled it should go west of the house, <br />thereby increasing setback distances. <br />Conclusion! <br />Lot 1 - Satisfactory primary site, trench drainfield; satisfactory <br />secondary site, mound, needs some sandy loam fill for futxire use. <br />Lot 2 - Satisfactory primary and secondary sites, trench drainfield. <br />Lot 3 - Existing primary system, secondary site is acceptable but <br />may need some sandy loam fill for future use. *Note! for lots 1 <br />and 3, the fill should be placed now; by the time these sites <br />are needed, enough settling may have occurred to provide good <br />sound sites.IT <br />Lot 4 - Failing existing system; need very detailed design plans <br />to show that replacement system can indeed be located on site. <br />« * <br />J <br /><; <br />,. <br />mmu <br />»«- R-f Wwrf-HS. A A. A -W,. <br />''.•ASMseMSMSSiMmmvmeM.M