My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-01-1982 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1982
>
02-01-1982 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2023 10:55:59 AM
Creation date
2/15/2023 10:55:10 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
4 . <br />cm <br />4. <br />i <br />LI <br />5. <br />6. <br />7. <br />i <br />■•■• •■1; ,••■ <br />V- <br />:M - ■ / <br />City of ORONO <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />NO. /3_ ------- <br />The City Council finds that the facts presented, including <br />traffic safety, building code violations, septic code <br />violations, and the comprehensive Pj*”® <br />constitute sufficient cause to deny a Conditional Use Permit <br />for a greenhouse on this property pursuant to Section* 3Z.*i« <br />and 34.025, even if the existing property use was not a <br />non-conforming use. <br />The City Council finds that the existing business i» * <br />non-conforming use under the provisions of Section 31.100 <br />et. seq.? all non-conforming uses are intended by adopted <br />public policy and ordinance to in time be eliminated due <br />to obsolescence, exhaustion or destruction; that addition <br />of a greenhouse to the property, whether attached . <br />detached, would constitute an expansion and intensification <br />of said non-conforming use; and that the application for <br />a conditional use permit for the greenhouse is therefore <br />denied as being contrary to the letter and intent of <br />section 31.000 et. seq. and particularly. Section 31.10* <br />of the Orono Zoning Code. <br />The City Council finds that the business activities <br />and construction undertaken on the premises by <br />Misegarver without the required building or zoning <br />permits can in fact be eliminated and reduced to the <br />level and intent of the 1968 Conditional Use Permit# <br />which permit established a reasonable and substantial <br />level of use for the property. <br />The City Council finds that even after denial of the <br />proposed greenhouse and after reduction of business <br />activities to that authorized by the 1968 Conditional <br />Use Permit, there will remain multiple use and occupancy <br />of the property which constitutes more than the permitted <br />use of property in the RR-IB zoning district. <br />a) The occupied trailer house constitutes the single <br />family residence as permitted in the RR-IB zoning district. <br />b) There will still exist a 20 X 40 greenhouse located <br />near the center-east end of the property. <br />c) There will still exist the basic Kellers Market (49' X60*) <br />building and retail business'activities operating <br />as a nonconforming commercial use in the RR-lB <br />,one family residential zoning district. <br />Patje 14 of 17 <br />. t
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.