My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-18-1982 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1982
>
01-18-1982 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2023 10:56:20 AM
Creation date
2/15/2023 10:54:52 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
101
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CSPP JUNE* 1980 <br />REVISED NOVEMBER# 1981 <br />COOPERATIVK 8EWEGE TREATMENT POLICIES <br />1. THE CITY OP ORONO MILL COOPERATE WITH ADJOINING MUNICIPALITIES. <br />Lak« municipal boundaries do not always follow '»*J***J*'* <br />2. <br />or historic development patterns; thus the sewage treatm <br />needs of isolated neighborhoods often are best and <br />economically served by cooperative agreements <br />Orono expects to continue the agreements and working <br />established with Minnetonka Beach. Wayzata, Long Lake, and Medina. <br />THE CITY OP ORONO WILL COOPERATE WITH STATE AND REGIONAL <br />IN THE SATISPACTORY ACHIEVEMENT OF METROPOLITAN PLANNING OBJECTIVE. <br />for rational planning and efficient use of public urban <br />in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area. The City of Orono supports <br />the Metropolitan Haste Control Commission in their need to determine <br />ultimate capacity of regional sewer service facilities. <br />THE CITY OP ORONO FIRMLY OPPOSES ANY PLAN TO PHASE OUT THE MAPLE <br />PLAIN WWTP VIA AN INTERCEPTOR THROUGH RURAL ORONO. <br />such an interceptor would adversely affect Orono*s entire rural <br />land use plan and would unduly impact Orono's rural landowners. <br />The final Orono-Long Lake Interceptor design was sized^|W«riMr- <br />and approved for flow from Orono, Minnetonka Beach, Long Lake <br />and Medina-Morningside only. Orono, the 208 Study, <br />revised Metropolitan Council Water Quality Management policy Plan <br />all recommend upgrading the capacity and phosphorus removal <br />equipment in the existing plant. This option is many <br />expensive than interceptor construction and will meet all Lake <br />Minnetonka discharge standards. Phosphorus concentrations reaching <br />Jennings Bay will be further reduced upon completion of the MCWD <br />Painter Creek Upper Watershed Retention project, inflow ano <br />infiltration control in Maple Plain will further improve plint <br />function and discharge standarde. Finally if necessary. Maple <br />pl^ln WWTP discharge could be redirected to the Crow River <br />vstershed where discharge standards are lower, and where most <br />of the sewer flow originates in the first place. <br />CMP 6-17 <br />U <br />I
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.