My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-18-1982 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1982
>
01-18-1982 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2023 10:56:20 AM
Creation date
2/15/2023 10:54:52 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
101
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
; <br />I <br />1 <br />#669 Tonka Lake Properties <br />1340 Baldur Park Road <br />January 13, 1982 <br />page 2 <br />- PRO Subdivision ■L-t* <br />The driveways shown on the plan would not allow turning <br />of delivery trucks or fire equipment. <br />Extension of public Baldur Park Road to a new dedicated <br />cul de sac was a requirement of approval for #466 and <br />has again been proposed in this application. Such a public <br />turn-around is necessary for this road, and is certainly <br />required if new development occurs on the peninsula as <br />proposed. Because of recalcitrant land owners, however, <br />the City may have to participate in condemnation of some <br />right of way. This was offered during the last application <br />but the developer never requested such help. <br />DENSITY ...fhe developer has planned 5 units based on % acre density <br />and a 2.71 acre gross property size. If a 50* private <br />road outlot were provided pursuant to CMP transportation <br />policies, the net property area exclusive of right of way <br />ffould allow at most 4 units, not 5. Planning Commission <br />and/or Council should provide guidance as to whether gross <br />oif net area is to be used for determining permitted density <br />HARDCOVER <br />fhe developer has indicated hardcover area, but has not <br />provided flgtires to show % of coverage in the 75-250 foot <br />zone. A hardcover variance is obviously necessary to allow <br />construction of a road (within the 75 foot setback) between <br />the cul de sac and the development. There is no structural <br />hardcover (except existing) proposed within 75 feet. <br />However, it appears very likely that the hardcover proposed <br />grossly exceeds the 25% allowable in the 75'-250' zone. <br />DOCKAGE <br />There’Ts obviously enough shoreline to have all units <br />riparian. The Planning Commission/Council should provide <br />guidance as to whether they would prefer individual dockage <br />on individual lots or outlets, or whether they would prefer <br />one joint use dock within the common open space. Individual <br />dockage would allow up to 4 watercraft per unit (20 boats), <br />idiereas joint dockage may allow lesser limitations. <br />SEWERAGE . ^ ^ ^ <br />The existing house is one of a few remaining that has <br />never been connected to sewer. A condition of approval <br />of application #466 was Peterson's agreement to provide <br />the connection before July 31, 1980. He didn't. <br />On September 15, 1980, Mrs. Gladys Olson requested another <br />■ .( <br />■ • f
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.