Laserfiche WebLink
LAND USE PLANNING F.XMTWTT 1 <br />« <br />I> « <br />44 <br />OF THE PLAMNING COMMISSION MEE' ING OF DECEMBER 7, 1981 <br />f - Swanson noted that the Pf «.ve <br />fc'inf bSch''?hl? iSilS iLe to ienove their remaining <br />which ace not diseased elms. <br />°IqSu2mtnfbyiejLl9ninr?he'ldditirind “eJL!« <br />3' into the sensitive setback area? <br />Mr Nesset noted that if they were to leave off that extra <br />r’thit it would cut off a corner of the dining room^_ _ _ <br />Goetten asked the architect if there was no way that this <br />could be accomplished. <br />Kelley asked what type of patio they would be putting <br />up? <br />Applicants noted it would be a type of decking patio. <br />Goetten asked if it was impervious to water? <br />Nesset replied that it was half and half. <br />s.rs;.r:::.5-s ‘"'“™ <br />1 - Odd shape of lot - pie shaped <br />2 - Existing trees <br />3 - Previous 50* setback line when house was built. <br />4 - No additional land available. <br />5 - 3.500 sf of existing hardcover is the shared <br />driveway for abutting properties. <br />6 - Only feasible location for the addition • - to t e <br />front lakeside of the house, <br />such approval is subject to the following condition: <br />1 - Removal of brick patio. <br />Kelley seconded. Vote: Ayes (6). Nays (0). <br />Richard “e nl2®memb«rwSo'iare® <br />background on his P P ^ _ y,^th access to the dock.SrrtSUd tiarhrb'u??rj%fx 87- cement ramp to hold <br />erosion back from the lakeshore banks. <br />Mabusth asked if the lagoon was navigable in 1972 when <br />he purchased the property? <br />specter, stated that when he ^ught f«„P-P|«y_,the lagoon <br />(SWANSON CONT.l <br />RICHARD SPEETER <br />659 Minnetonka <br />Highlands Lane <br />Conditional Use <br />Permit <br />#665