Laserfiche WebLink
- <br />I <br />exhibit <br />hinotes of the planning commission meeting op august 17, 1981 page <br />Applicant was. »avi.ea that the^existing^gara^^^^^^ <br />be removed prior to iss that it would be in thethat the garage was 50 Tears old and that^it^^ ^ <br />middle of the to keep the building, <br />to ask for the building be kept for storage <br />‘pifpSfeS rusfuntt!\S*^ergarage is’completed. <br />CURTISS (CONT.) <br />1 - Encrcaohment into 75 • lakeshore area would be <br />, - teduluon of approximately 1700 sf of hardcover. <br />3 - Future proposed i™Provements would be located <br />further from the lakeshore.rurrnei a.a.w.w w.— — <br />4 - Aesthetic improvements and would enhance the <br />entire site. <br />5 - Hardship is the narrowness of the lot. <br />and subject to the following conditions: <br />1 - That adequate turnaround be provi e <br />2 - sttff'to make recommendation as to the best time <br />to remove existing garage. <br />McDonald seconded. Vote: Ayes (3), Nays (0). <br />Dorothy Forcier and J,®fgte^Ut^of^septi^'testing would <br />Mabusth stated determination could be made <br />rnce^niS: Thf ^r^p^os^dTe: ^coS^ruction. <br />DOROTHY FORCIER <br />4780 North Arm Di <br />Variance <br />1645 <br />I <br />[ <br />• i» A afmre lot in a 2 acre minimum Goetten noted that this is . <br />zone. <br />jabbour stated not only jou have^to relocate^the^^^ <br />house but find »^'*‘-*’^®le'setback between well and seotic system, <br />have to meet a 75 proposed construction was much <br />- . A A ft _ __ <br />Porcier asked if the new house would be 24’ x 28- would <br />that be ok? <br />"tJSrpSng^ecSp? “'r~mp?«t";i of iertlc“?es». <br />Goetten seconded. Vote. Ayes (3), Nays (0).