My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-18-1982 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1982 Planning Packets
>
01-18-1982 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2023 10:56:20 AM
Creation date
2/15/2023 10:54:52 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
101
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
foxD Kinger Subdivision <br />Page 7 <br />installed in these limiting soils, a set of governing criteria <br />have evolved over the last 50 years. Specifically, trench systems <br />are not allowed: 1) where the percolation rate is slower than 60 <br />minutes per inch of water level drop in a percolation test hole; <br />and 2) where the highest known water table or indicated saturated <br />®oil layer is less than 3' below the bottom of the trench. <br />In most cases, these same soils have a varying cunount of topsoil <br />which IS usually "loamier" and will accept and treat a limited <br />amount of effluent. <br />The pressure—mound system is designed specifically to use this <br />lo^y topsoil layer for effluent treatment and disposal. In <br />brief, a 12-24" layer of sand (placed over the natural roughened <br />topsoil) is fed effluent from a pressure distribution system in <br />an overlying rock bed. The biomat "valve" forms at the rock/ <br />sand interface which is 12-24" above the natural soil. Because <br />of the pressure distribution, an unsaturated air/effluent contact <br />is maintained as treatment occurs in the sand bed. This treated <br />fluent is then dispersed into the topsoil and allowed to move <br />laterally through the topsoil, possibly even past the boundaries <br />of the mound system (yet still below the surface) until it <br />eventually seeps downward or evaporates over a wide area. <br />It would be poor planning for Orono to allow installation of <br />standard trench drainfields in soils which have high-water table <br />characteristics, since many systems likely would eventually fail, <br />as was the case in Medina-Morningside. Since Orono has shown <br />a strict desire to limit the extension of sanitary sewers, it <br />appears reasonable to allow (and, in fact, promote) the use of <br />alternate on-site sewage treatment methods where development <br />pressures persist. Mound systems have been installed over the <br />last 10 to 15 years around the country as an alternative to <br />trenches. In Orono, pressure distribution mounds were first <br />installed in 1978. To date, the City has 13 pressure mounds <br />in service, with no recorded failures. <br />In my opinion, under specified site conditions, mound systems <br />® safe, sanitary, reliable method of sewage treatment. <br />•■LI
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.