Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF AUGUST 16, 1982 <br />The Planning Commission met on the above date. The <br />ollowing members were present; Acting Chairman Rovegno, <br />cDonald, Kelley, Goetten and Callahan. CounciImember <br />Tim Adams was present. Mabusth represented the City staff. <br />ATTENDANCE <br />7:30 PM <br />Rovegno moved to approve the consent items on the agenda.CONSENT AGENDA* <br />Callahan seconded. Vote: Ayes (5), Nays (0). <br />Mrs. Hollander was present. There was no one present in <br />the audience for this application. Mabusth noted the <br />certificate of mailing and the affidavit of publication. <br />Mabusth noted for the Planning Commission the septic <br />Information received from the Septic Consultant. She <br />noted that Lots 3, 4 and 5's lot lines would have to be <br />rearranged to secure adequate area for the locating of <br />a house and septic system. She added that Lot 5 will <br />access off Sixth Avenue North and that Mrs. Hollander <br />would be required to obtain an access permit from <br />Hennepin County. <br />HILDUR HOLLANDER I <br />250 Hollander Rd <br />Subdivision <br />#696 <br />Public Hearing <br />7:30 - 8:01 <br />Mabusth stated that she had talked to the Orono Superintendent <br />of the School District and he had stated that the school <br />boundaries go by the house location and border line cases <br />have a choice which school district they wish to atte* d. <br />^^Rovegno noted that the school district lines are backwards <br />anyway and that they should be changed. <br />Goetten noted that the neighbors have always had a choice <br />in which school they wished to attend, why should the <br />Planning Commission get involved with the school districts. <br />Callahan noted the three residences on one lot. <br />Mrs. Hollander noted that one residence was her homestead, <br />one is a farmhouse and one is a guest house. She noted <br />that the cottage would eventually be torn down. She <br />added that it has not been rented for the past two years <br />but is rented now. <br />Rovegno wanted to know the status of an outlot in a <br />subdivision? Is it for future roads or is it an unbuildaJle <br />lot? <br />5 <br />Mabusth stated that it was assumed that Mrs. Hollander <br />would come back and subdivide Outlot B at the time of the <br />second stage plat. As it is now, two residences are non- <br />conforming uses on a single lot. <br />c <br />Rovegno noted that if Mrs. Hollander ever wished to subdivide <br />Outlot B that she would have to come back and resubdivide <br />Outlot B. He noted that the Planning Commission would be <br />willing to include Outlot B in this subdivision if Mrs. <br />Hollander wished to include Outlot B in the current plat.