Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF JULY 19, 1982 Page 9 I" <br />CONT)„ <br />V, ^ <br />-; <br />? V |l <br />S;„r2rw S; S:t "■■ SV2iirx3nc© <br />Kelley asked how much hardcover would be increased? #695 <br />McDonald asked if Baldur Park was a private road or a <br />City road? <br />Mabusth stated that it was a City road up until Mr. Boar's <br />property. <br />McDonald stated that these parcels of land weren't legally <br />combined for tax parcels with a street dividing them. <br />Also she noted that you can't put a garage on a property <br />unless a principal structure is on the property also. <br />Mabusth referred to the plat map and combination forms <br />dated 1979 that reflect the combination for tax purposes. <br />Rovegno stated that the size of the structure seemed more <br />like a house than a garage. He noted the building size <br />of 25' X 52' which is much too large. <br />Mr. Stodola stated that the applicant does a lot of wood <br />work, has a few boats and noted that this is the applicant s <br />summer cottage. <br />/^^Donald insisted that the lots were not combined and stated <br />Vhat the lot combination form came from the finance division <br />at Hennepin County for tax purposes but that doesn t mean <br />that the lots are legally combined. <br />Mabusth stated that these lots are combined for tax purposes <br />and was completed in 1979 well after Baldur Park Road <br />became a City road. <br />Goetten again noted the size of this proposed structure. <br />She felt this was much too large for a garage. <br />Kelley felt that the second story was alright but noted <br />that there is a hardcover concern. He also noted that <br />there is a swcimp behind the proposed structure. He <br />felt that the neighbors shouldn't have any problems with <br />the proposed garage because the structure is between the <br />trees. He noted the solar second story which is very <br />attractive. <br />Opheim stated that this proposed garage is in the 0-75 <br />setback and the real issue is the applicant wants a <br />variance, he has sufficient hardships but the structure <br />is much too large. <br />Opheim moved to table Guenther Roth's application with the <br />Suggestion that the applicant considerably reduce the <br />i|pvoposed garage and therefore have substantially less <br />hardcover. <br />Kelley seconded.